Semimembranosus (beef) | 20 μs, 90 Hz, 0.36 kV/cm20 μs, 20 Hz, 0.60 kV/cmThe treatment time or number of pulses were not provided | Post-rigor, sample size was trimmed fitted in the batch chamber (13×8×5 cm), direct contact with the electrodes | No significant reduction in shear force | Bhat et al. (2019a) |
Longissimus et lumborum (beef) | 20 μs, 200 Hz, 0.23 kV/cm20 μs, 200 Hz, 0.68 kV/cmTotal treatment time: 30 s | Post-rigor, sample size was trimmed fitted in the batch chamber (13×8×5 cm), direct contact with the electrodes | No significant reduction in shear force | Khan et al. (2017) |
Semitendinosus (beef) | 20 μs, 50 Hz, 1.40 kV/cm, 1,032 pulses | Post-rigor, sample size was trimmed fitted in a triangular batch chamber (6×4×6 cm), direct contact the electrodes | No significant reduction in shear force | Faridnia et al. (2015) |
Breast meat (turkey) | 20 μs, 10 to 110 Hz, 1.25 to 2.0 kV/cm, 100 to 300 pulses | Post-rigor, sample size was trimmed to 6×2×2 cm, Direct contact with the electrodes | No significant reduction in shear force | Arroyo et al. (2015a) |
Longissimus thoracis et lumborum (beef) | 20 μs, 10 Hz, 1.40 kV/cm, 300 and 600 pulses | Post-rigor, sample size was trimmed to 6×2×2 cm, direct contact with the electrodes | No significant reduction in shear force | Arroyo et al. (2015b) |
Longissimus thoracis (beef) | 20 μs, 1 to 50 Hz, 0.20 to 0.56 kV/cm, 30 to 1,528 pulses | Post-rigor, sample size was trimmed to 10×8×4 cm, direct contact with the electrodes | No significant reduction in shear force | Faridnia et al. (2014) |
Longissimus thoracis et lumborum (pork) | 20 μs, 100 and 200 Hz, 1.20 and 2.30 kV/cm, 150 and 300 pulses | Post-rigor, sample size was trimmed to 6×2×2 cm, direct contact with the electrodes | No significant reduction in hardness and chewiness | McDonnell et al. (2014) |
Semitendinosus (beef) | 20 μs, 152 Hz, 1.10 kV/cm, 152 pulses20 μs, 200 Hz, 1.50 kV/cm, 200 pulses20 μs, 65 Hz, 1.90 kV/cm, 250 pulses20 μs, 5 Hz, 2.80 kV/cm, 300 pulses | Post-rigor, sample size was trimmed to 6×2×2 cm, direct contact with the electrodes | No significant reduction in shear force | O’Dowd et al. (2013) |