Table 1. Effects of drying methods on the pH and color of heat-induced duck blood gels

Trait Treatment
SD FD VD HD
Raw pH 7.87±0.01a 7.87±0.01a 7.76±0.00b 7.72±0.01c
CIE L* 11.80±0.47 11.33±0.40 11.12±0.05 11.76±0.47
CIE a* 2.66±0.19 2.54±0.12 2.66±0.05 2.68±0.03
CIE b* 1.32±0.12 1.25±0.08 1.32±0.06 1.33±0.09
Color difference (ΔE) 0.60±0.32 0.81±0.25 0.80±0.51 -1)
Cooked pH 7.82±0.01a 7.83±0.01a 7.66±0.02b 7.62±0.02b
CIE L* 35.91±0.26 35.63±0.15 35.88±0.46 35.92±0.01
CIE a* 14.89±0.19 14.85±0.19 14.46±0.26 14.43±0.34
CIE b* 11.69±0.10 11.86±0.05 11.71±0.42 11.67±0.66
Color difference (ΔE) 0.80±0.13 0.90±0.10 0.71±0.23 -
All values are presented as the mean±SEM (n=3).
The color values of HD treatments were used as standard to compare color differences of other treatments and ΔE was calculated according to CIE76 color difference formulation.
Means within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
SD, gels from spray-dried duck blood powder; FD, gels from freeze-dried duck blood powder; VD, gels from vacuum-dried duck blood powder; HD, gels from hot air-dried duck blood powder.