Table 1. Effects of drying methods on the pH and color of heat-induced duck blood gels
Trait | Treatment |
| SD | FD | VD | HD |
Raw | pH | 7.87±0.01a | 7.87±0.01a | 7.76±0.00b | 7.72±0.01c |
CIE L* | 11.80±0.47 | 11.33±0.40 | 11.12±0.05 | 11.76±0.47 |
CIE a* | 2.66±0.19 | 2.54±0.12 | 2.66±0.05 | 2.68±0.03 |
CIE b* | 1.32±0.12 | 1.25±0.08 | 1.32±0.06 | 1.33±0.09 |
Color difference (ΔE) | 0.60±0.32 | 0.81±0.25 | 0.80±0.51 | -1) |
Cooked | pH | 7.82±0.01a | 7.83±0.01a | 7.66±0.02b | 7.62±0.02b |
CIE L* | 35.91±0.26 | 35.63±0.15 | 35.88±0.46 | 35.92±0.01 |
CIE a* | 14.89±0.19 | 14.85±0.19 | 14.46±0.26 | 14.43±0.34 |
CIE b* | 11.69±0.10 | 11.86±0.05 | 11.71±0.42 | 11.67±0.66 |
Color difference (ΔE) | 0.80±0.13 | 0.90±0.10 | 0.71±0.23 | - |
All values are presented as the mean±SEM (n=3).
The color values of HD treatments were used as standard to compare color differences of other treatments and ΔE was calculated according to CIE76 color difference formulation.
Means within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
SD, gels from spray-dried duck blood powder; FD, gels from freeze-dried duck blood powder; VD, gels from vacuum-dried duck blood powder; HD, gels from hot air-dried duck blood powder.