Table 2. Results of the meta-analysis of the role of dietary carotenoids on performance
No | Parameter | N | SMD/d+(RE 95% CI) | p-value | I2(%) | p-value | Kendall’s τ | p-value |
1 | Feed intake | 93 | 0.32 (0.02, 0.61) | 0.034 | 99.249 | <0.05 | –0.069 | 0.331 |
2 | FCR | 78 | –0.31 (–0.60, –0.02) | 0.034 | 99.066 | <0.05 | –0.287 | <0.001 |
3 | Final body weight | 56 | 0.33 (0.05, 0.60) | 0.02 | 97.662 | <0.05 | 0.048 | 0.606 |
4 | Egg production | 101 | 0.38 (0.14, 0.63) | 0.002 | 98.868 | <0.05 | 0.118 | 0.080 |
N, number of databases; SMD/d+(RE 95% CI), standardized mean difference (true effect size) by random-effects model with 95% confidence interval; I2, inconsistency (%); FCR, feed conversion ratio.