Table 3. Results of the meta-analysis of the role of dietary carotenoids on egg quality
No | Parameter | N | SMD/d+(RE 95% CI) | p-value | I2(%) | p-value | Kendall’s τ | p-value |
1 | Egg weight | 115 | 0.29 (0.09, 0.50) | 0.005 | 98.27 | <0.05 | 0.129 | 0.042 |
2 | Shell thickness | 95 | –0.02 (–0.20, 0.17) | 0.870 | 97.96 | <0.05 | 0.035 | 0.624 |
3 | Egg yolk color intensity | 95 | 2.11 (1.71, 2.51) | <0.001 | 98.93 | <0.05 | 0.037 | 0.600 |
4 | Haugh unit | 102 | 0.26 (0.11, 0.42) | 0.001 | 96.82 | <0.05 | 0.149 | 0.027 |
5 | Egg yolk cholesterol | 27 | –0.38 (–0.59, –0.16) | <0.001 | 97.85 | <0.05 | –0.217 | 0.117 |
6 | Egg yolk carotenoid | 26 | 1.17 (0.59, 1.75) | <0.001 | 99.40 | <0.05 | 0.430 | 0.002 |
N, number of databases; SMD/d+(RE 95% CI), standardized mean difference (true effect size) by random-effects model with 95% confidence interval; I2, inconsistency (%).