ARTICLE

The Application of High-Intensity Ultrasound on Wet-Dry Combined Aged Pork Loin Induces Physicochemical and Oxidative Alterations

Yu-Min Son1,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0793-4055, Eun-Yeong Lee1,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-7349, AMM Nurul Alam1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-3718, Abdul Samad1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-3363, Md Jakir Hossain1https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7663-9202, Young-Hwa Hwang2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3687-3535, Jeong-Keun Seo3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4493-6084, Chul-Beom Kim3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-3013, Jae-Ha Choi3https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7292-9130, Seon-Tea Joo1,2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5483-2828
Author Information & Copyright
1Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52852, Korea
2Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52852, Korea
3Deeplant Pvt. Ltd., Goyang 10524, Korea
*Corresponding author : Seon-Tea Joo, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52852, Korea, Tel: +82-55-772-1943, Fax: +82-55-772-1949, E-mail: stjoo@gnu.ac.kr

These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 19, 2024 ; Revised: Mar 18, 2024 ; Accepted: Mar 18, 2024

Published Online: Jul 01, 2024

Abstract

This research investigated the synergic outcome of high intensity ultrasound (HIU) treatment and wet-dry combined aging (WDCA) on physiochemical characteristics and lipid oxidation during refrigerated storage to ameliorate pork meat’s quality and shelf life. The CIE b* values, cooking loss (CL %), and pH of the HIU treated samples were higher than those of the control over the aging period. They were significantly (p<0.05) modified by the aging period and ultrasound (US) treatment. However, the released water (RW %) and moisture were not significantly influenced by US treatment (p>0.05). The Warner-Bratzler shear force of HIU-treated samples was lower over control values except in 7–14 d, and it showed a significant difference between control and US treatment according to the significance of HIU (p<0.05). The thiobarbituric acid reactive substance of HIU-treated samples was significantly higher (p<0.05) than control values over the aging period. These results suggested that HIU treatment and WDCA showed a synergistic effect of maximizing the tenderness, but lipid oxidation was higher than before ultrasonic treatment. In agreement with this, the most favorable approach would involve implementing wet aging for a period of two weeks followed by dry aging for a period not exceeding one week after the application of HIU.

Keywords: high intensity ultrasound; physiochemical characteristics; combined wet-dry aging; lipid oxidation; pork loin

Introduction

The growing worldwide population has anticipated an increase in meat production and consumption. Furthermore, rising income trends drive consumers towards high-quality meat with excellent nutritional profiles and diversified product categories. Pork meat is one of the most used meats in the world, while pork meat production is increasing day by day. In 2016, Pork production in the Republic of Korea was 891,000; by 2021, it increased to 1,097,000 tons (KOSIS, 2022). The number of pigs raised increased as there were 10,366,779 in 2016 and 11,216,566 in 2021, and pork consumption also increased during this tenure (Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation, 2021). Consumers demand that the quantity and quality of meat should be improved (Park et al., 2022).

Meat aging is a traditional technique used for preservation. Meat aging is a prominent technique in the meat industry for processing meat products, as it enhances the longevity, taste, succulence, and tenderness of the flesh (Terjung et al., 2021). Aging plays the main role in manufacturing high-quality products (Mungure et al., 2020). Aging is largely divided into wet-aging and dry-aging. Wet aging, in other words, known as vacuum aging, is known as a reasonably inexpensive methodology where meat is vacuum packed and refrigerated (Smith et al., 2008) to stop bacterial growth and weight loss brought on by water evaporation (Campbell et al., 2001). To improve meat quality e.g., tenderness and flavor, wet aging has been widely used (Hwang and Hong, 2020). In the dry aging technique, unpacked meat is usually stored in a refrigerator with regulated humidity (62%–85%) and at a temperature of around 4°C. However, this procedure is costly due to more time and space requirements (Stenström et al., 2014). Additionally, the dried surface is responsible for weight loss during trimming (Smith et al., 2008). The recent studies have shown that although the optimal times for dry aging is 14–21 d and 7–10 d for wet aging, the dry aging of meat has been conducted up to 60 d (Leroy et al., 2004).

US has been successfully used in meat processing along with aging or curing in meat processing industry to address several issues through the novel application of mechanical, chemical, and thermal influences on the muscle structure. On the other hand, high intensity ultrasound (HIU) is a nonthermal method that became popular for producing naturally tasting processed meat products. In this method, sound energy is used lower than microwave frequencies (10 MHz) and higher than the human audible range (>20 kHz) for tenderization of meat and shelf life extension (Alarcon-Rojo et al., 2015). Both low-intensity (20–100 kHz) and high-intensity (>5 W/cm2 or 10–1,000 W/cm2) are widely employed for processing pork meat (Ashokkumar, 2011). Alternative technologies like HIU have been explored to enhance brining and lower the use of chemical additives/preservatives to maintain meat safety (Delgado-Pando et al., 2021; Singla and Sit, 2021). HIU is appealing since it can specially lower the amount of sodium and phosphates used in cured pig product processing (Zhang et al., 2021) and aids in producing meat products with clean labelling (Al-Hilphy et al., 2020; Rudy et al., 2020).

Research studies indicated that US offers notable benefits in the areas of refrigerated storage (Zheng and Sun, 2006), during meat thawing (Miles et al., 1999), salt cured meat (Cárcel et al., 2007), cooked processing (Chemat et al., 2011), improved microbiological quality (Caraveo et al., 2015), improved sous vide processing (Lee et al., 2023b), and tenderizing (Peña-González et al., 2017). The application of US in meat aging is prevalent because of its substantial effect on cavitation, which causes improved efficiency of mass transfer and reduced curing time (Li et al., 2024). The application of US from 20–100 kHz is included as a cutting edge technology and shows great potential in terms of meat tenderization, and meat functional properties, and has the advantage of accelerating the processing time (Inguglia et al., 2018). The US is divided into high intensity/low frequency (>10 W) and low intensity/high frequency (<1 W) as per the intensities of US (Li et al., 2024). US can be recognized as a nonthermal phenomenon, however, the generation of heat occurs through mechanical friction caused by mechanical vibrations during propagation, resulting in a temperature increase ranging from 1 to 10 degrees (Zhang and Abatzoglou, 2020). Recently, researchers have focused more attention on HIU rather than low intensity ultrasound. Many recent studies have reported the use of HIU on fresh meat with interesting benefits have found in freezing, thawing, marination, cooking, bacterial inhibition, and tenderizing (Caraveo et al., 2015; Cárcel et al., 2007; Chemat et al., 2011; Miles et al., 1999; Peña-González et al., 2017; Zheng and Sun, 2006). There is potential for HIU and aging in meat categories like cultured meat (Joo et al., 2022) and hybrid culture meat (Alam et al., 2024). The application of wet-dry mixed aging coupled with the application of HIU in pork has been rather scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the alterations in meat qualities resulting from the use of wet-dry mixed aging and HIU.

Materials and Methods

Material

Samples of loin from 6 porcine (LYD, 8 months, 112±5 kg carcass weight) were obtained from the retail store. All pork loin meat samples used in the experiment were raised on the same parameters with a uniform feeding and management regime. The outside muscle fat, bone, and connective tissues were delicately withdrawn without inflicting the flesh quality. Samples were sliced into pieces of 10×11×7.5 cm (length×width×height, respectively). The sliced samples were vacuum packed using polyvinyl chloride bags (Koch easy-pack 2001, Koch Supplies, Kansas City, MO, USA) and stored in a refrigerator at 2°C.

Sample preparation

The processing method was divided into two segments: the wet-dry combined aging method and the novel application of HIU. The methodology is summarized in Fig. 1. Samples for the HIU treatment were placed in vacuum packs and then put in the ultrasound device (Daehan Ultrasonic Engineering, Seoul, Korea) for processing. The HIU parameters followed in this study were 2,400 W, 36.2 kHz, 10 bar, and treatment time to the meat for 90 min as per the suggested maximum limit by the manufacturers R&D division.

kosfa-44-4-899-g1
Fig. 1. The schematic illustration of HIU treatment combined wet dry aging of pork loin. HIU, high intensity ultrasound.
Download Original Figure

The cross-aging pork loin samples were 21 d for wet aging, followed by dry aging for 3 d and 7 d. For dry aging meat samples were stored in a specialized aging-assisted refrigerator from LMP-1045DA, Daeyoung E&B, Ansan, Korea. The aging parameters were 2°C, 85%–90% RH, and airflow rate 0.5–2.0 m/s. for wet aging, the samples were stored in vacuum sealed bags, whereas for dry aging, the meat was exposed removing the packaging.

Change in color pattern during high intensity ultrasound and wet dry combined aging

Minolta colorimeter (CR-300, Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan) was used to measure the meat color from the outside of pork loin. Before running the colorimeter was standardized with a white plate (Y=93.5, X=0.3132, y=0.3198). The CIE values (CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b*) were taken from three various locations.

Effect of high intensity ultrasound and aging in the acidic condition of muscle

For the measurement of meat pH, a digital pH meter model MP 230 (Mettler Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland) was utilized following appropriate calibration. The probe was calibrated at a temperature of 25°C using calibration solutions with pH values of 7.00, 4.01, and 9.21 in order to measure pH. A meat sample weighing approximately 3±0.05 g was incorporated with 27 mL of deionized water and then thoroughly mixed using a high speed homogenizer (T25, IKA Werke, Staufen, Germany) for 30 s.

Cooking loss

The cooking loss (CL) was assessed by measuring the reduction in weight that occued throughout the cooking process. The samples (25±0.05 g) were packed in plastic bags and then they were heated in the water bath at a temperature of 75°C for 30 min. Samples were subsequently subjected to for a duration of 15 min, after which their weight was taken.

Cooking loss ( % ) = Cooked loss Uncooked loss × 100
(1)
Released water

Methodology from Joo et al. (2022) was follow to measure the releasing content. A pork loin meat sample weighing 3.0±0.05 g was placed on a Whatman filter paper that had been dried and weighed beforehand. The filter paper had a diameter of 11 cm and was covered with a pair of thin plastic films. The meat samples were measured using an electronic scale, and then placed between Plexiglas plates together with the filter paper and plastic film. A 2.5 kg load and unrestricted mechanical force were exerted for 5 min. Subsequently, the filter paper and plastic films were moistened and their weights were measured with utmost accuracy after the compressed meat was carefully eliminated.

The released water (RW) was expressed by the following Eq. (2):

RW ( % ) = [ ( Damp filter-paper and plastic films weight ) ( Filter-paper and plastic films weight ) / Meat sample weight ] × 100.
(2)
Moisture

A meat sample (2.0±0.05 g) was placed on an aluminium dish after measuring the weight of the dried aluminum dish. Afterward, the aluminum dish containing the meat was placed in a dry oven and dried at 105°C for 16 h. And then, the weight of the aluminum dish was measured.

The moisture content was represented by the following Eq. (3):

Moisture  ( % ) = [ ( Aluminum dish weight + Meat sample weight before drying ) ( Aluminum dish weight + Meat sample weight after drying ) / Meat sample weight ] × 100.
(3)
Warner-Bratzler shear force

The Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF; kg/cm2) was analyzed using a TA1 texture analyzer (AMETEK, Berwyn, PA, USA) with a V-shaped shear blade. A cross-sectional area encompassing approximately 2.0 cm2 was cut from each of the six samples, as close as possible to dimensions of 1.0 cm by 2.0 cm, for the purpose to evaluate cutting force. The samples were positioned perpendicular to the blade. The speed rate of the crosshead was set at 100 mm/min. The maximum scale load capacity was 50 kg.

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance analysis

To determine the oxidative value, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) was determined based on the altered approach from Buege and Aust (1978). A quantity of around 5 g of meat was measured and placed into a glass conical tube with a volume of 50 mL. The meat was then mixed properly with 15 mL of deionized water using a homogenizer (T25) for 10 s at 3,000×g. Afterwards, 1 mL of meat homogenate was moved to a disposable test tube (3×100 mm). In the test tube butylated hydroxyanisole (50 μL, 10%) and thiobarbituric acid/trichloroacetic acid (TBA/TCA; 2 mL) were added. The mixture was subjected to vortexing and thereafter incubated in a hot water bath for a duration of 15 min in order to facilitate color development. The sample was subjected to a cooling process in cold water for 10 min, followed by another round of vortex, and thereafter underwent centrifugation at 3,000×g for 15 min. The absorbance of the resulting supernatant solution was determined at 531 nm against a blank containing 1 mL of distilled water and 2 mL of TBA/TCA solution. The amounts of TBARS were expressed as mg of malondialdehyde (MDA)/kg of meat.

Statistical analysis

Experimental data was analyzed using the statistical analysis systems’ analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure (SAS, 2002). Duncan’s multiple range test determined significant differences among means at a 5% significance level (SAS, 2002). This experiment had a completely randomized design with a 7 (aging period; 0 vs 7–3 vs 7–7 vs 14–3 vs 14–7 vs 21–3 vs 21–7) × 2 (ultrasound; application vs non-application) factorial arrangement of treatments.

Results and Discussion

Change in color pattern during high intensity ultrasound and wet dry combined aging

The change in meat color of pork loin treated with wet-dry combined aging and HIU were shown in Table 1. Meat color is the most important consideration for customers when they buy meat or meat products (Bekhit and Faustman, 2005; Chemat et al., 2011). Therefore, meat color is essential to consumers. The meat color index is divided into CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b*, which means lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. The CIE L* had a significant difference between the control and HIU depending on the wet-dry aging period (p<0.05). For both samples with and without HIU, wet aging for 21 d and dry aging for 3 and 7 d showed the highest values. Fig. 2 illustrates the physical appearances and color changes of control and treatments.

Table 1. Changes in meat color of pork loins treated ultrasound during wet and dry combined aging
Measurement Wet-dry aging period (d) SEM Contrast
0 7–3 7–7 14–3 14–7 21–3 21–7 AG US AG×US
C T C T C T C T C T C T C T
CIE L* 50.7cd 51.1bcd 50.5d 50.1cd 49.6d 48.9d 53.2abc 53.6ab 49.6d 49.4d 55.0a 55.0a 54.6a 55.5a 2.73 <0.001 0.643 0.977
CIE a* 7.89bcde 7.83cde 7.74de 9.47a 7.95bcde 8.13bcde 9.14ab 8.24abcde 8.00bcde 7.25e 8.34abcde 9.14ab 9.07abc 8.67abcd 1.23 0.006 0.689 0.015
CIE b* 1.80g 2.19fg 3.12ef 6.33a 3.55e 6.02ab 3.74de 6.34c 5.04bc 6.65a 4.65cd 6.37a 5.69abc 6.36a 1.19 <0.001 <0.001 0.002

a–g Means with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different.

C, control; T, treatment; AG, aging; US, ultrasound.

Download Excel Table
kosfa-44-4-899-g2
Fig. 2. Physical appearance of pork loin during wet-dry aging coupled with HIU treatment. HIU, high intensity ultrasound.
Download Original Figure

Overall, in the case of CIE L* value, the aging period was found to affect the CIE L* value (p<0.05), but the application of US treatment and the synergy effect between HIU treatment and the aging period had no discernible impact (p>0.05). The value of a (CIE a*) had a significant difference between the control and treatment according to the significance of the aging period (p<0.05). Overall, in the case of CIE a* value, the aging period and the synergy effect between HIU treatment and the aging period appeared to affect the value of CIE a* (p<0.05), but the application of HIU treatment did not appear to affect (p>0.05). The b value (CIE b*) showed a tendency to increase during the aging period in both the control and the HIU treatment value was higher than that of the non-ultrasonic sample. Overall, in the case of the CIE b* value, the aging period, HIU treatment, and the synergy effect between HIU treatment and the aging period appeared to affect the CIE b* value (p<0.05). Due to the decreased oxidation of color pigments and lower heat generation, previous studies also found that HIU treatment did not affect the color of beef meat (Chang et al., 2015; Jayasooriya et al., 2007; Sikes et al., 2014). The high CIE b* value in this experiment was assumed due to the difference in species of pork and beef meat, where pork meat is more sensitive to US treatment. Variable results were found in other studies where meat was cured in combination with HIU. In contrast to the findings of the present study, a notable rise was observed in the CIE L* of rabbit meat when applying US assisted marinating (40 kHz) in conjunction with a margination (Gómez-Salazar et al., 2018). The CIE L* values observed in this investigation are within the typical range for pork. In another experiment, the CIE L* value was much higher in pork, ranging between 50–52 as there was a variable diet treatment carried out (Arowolo et al., 2020).

Effect of high intensity ultrasound and aging in the acidic condition of muscle

The change in pH and water-holding capacity (WHC) of the pork loin with wet-dry combined aging and HIU were shown in Table 2. The WHC, regarded as an essential meat quality parameter, is evaluated by pH, moisture, RW, and CL. The pH and WHC are associated, and the lower the pH, the more likely the isoelectric point will reduce the WHC. Higher pH values enhance the WHC of meat owing to changes in the electrical charges within muscle protein (Alarcon-Rojo et al., 2019). The meat’s pH significantly impacts muscle protein’s qualitative and functional features. This study’s pH ranged from 5.7 to 5.8, which is a typical pH for meat. Several studies have demonstrated that meat with a higher pH exhibits a faster tenderization rate than meats with a typical range of 5.6–5.8 (Peña-Gonzalez et al., 2019). The pH value had a significant difference according to the significance of the aging period (p>0.05), and the wet aging for 14 d followed by dry aging for 7 d with HIU application was the highest value in the aging period (p<0.05). The aging period and HIU treatment appeared to affect the pH (p<0.05), but the synergy effect between the aging period and HIU treatment did not appear to affect (p>0.05). These results correspond to other reports concerning US-treated meat (Dolatowski et al., 2000; Dorel-Petru et al., 2016; Sikes et al., 2014; Stadnik and Dolatowski, 2011; Stadnik et al., 2008).

Table 2. Changes in pH and water-holding capacity of pork loins treated ultrasound during wet and dry combined aging
Measurement Wet-dry aging period (d) SEM Contrast
0 7–3 7–7 14–3 14–7 21–3 21–7 AG US AG×US
C T C T C T C T C T C T C T
pH 5.74b 5.70cde 5.72bcd 5.69de 5.72bcd 5.67e 5.75ab 5.72a 5.78a 5.74bc 5.67e 5.68e 5.75ab 5.73bcd 0.04 <0.001 <0.001 0.092
Moisture 58.3bcd 59.1ab 58.1bcd 58.5abc 57.6cd 57.0d 59.2ab 59.8a 57.6cd 57.0d 57.9bcd 57.6cd 57.3cd 56.9d 1.33 <0.001 0.963 0.402
CL 23.81b 23.16bc 25.34a 25.11a 23.54f 21.56g 20.41e 25.32a 20.89de 22.24cd 21.27de 22.33cd 19.71e 19.68e 1.62 <0.001 0.003 <0.001
RW 11.63a 11.44a 7.64bc 6.89bcd 7.11bcd 6.82bcd 5.94de 6.43b 4.62ef 4.91ef 6.55cd 6.62cd 4.11f 4.42f 1.39 <0.001 0.299 0.056

a–g Means with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different.

C, control; T, treatment; AG, aging; US, ultrasound.

Download Excel Table
Water-holding capacity

The moisture had a significant difference according to the significance of the aging period (p>0.05), and the wet aging for 14 d followed by dry aging for 3 d with HIU application was the highest value in the aging period (p<0.05), but the wet aging for 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d followed by dry aging 7 d with HIU application was the lowest value in aging period (p<0.05). The moisture content was significantly (p<0.05) influenced by the duration of aging, but treatment with HIU and the combined effect of the control and treatment did not seem to have any impact. The CL had a significant difference during the aging period (p<0.05). The wet aging for 7 d followed by dry aging for 3 d with HIU treatment was the highest value, and the wet aging for 7 d followed by dry aging for 7 d without HIU treatment was the lowest value in the aging period. The CL was found to be significantly affected by the aging period, HIU treatment, and synergistic effect between control and treatment (p<0.05). The RW significantly differed during the aging period (p<0.05). In the case of RW, the overall value decreased as the aging period passed. The aging 0 d was the highest value, and the wet aging for 21 d, followed by dry aging for 7 d, regardless of HIU treatment, was the lowest value in the aging period (p<0.05). The study revealed that the aging time had a significant impact on the RW (p<0.05), but the HIU treatment and combined effect of the control and treatment did not show any significant impact (p>0.05). The HIU generated the cavitation effects, producing cellular rupture and protein denaturation by heat. Nevertheless, the reason for the increase in WHC when applying HIU was expected to be that the WHC was redistributed through aging, thereby increasing WHC (Siró et al., 2009). This observation aligns with the study conducted by Stadnik et al. (2008), where the application of US pre-treatment enhanced the WHC in beef meat.

Warner-Bratzler shear force

The change in WBSF of pork loin treated with wet-dry combined aging and HIU is shown in Fig. 3. The most crucial textural characteristic, tenderness, impacts consumer perception most (Jayasooriya et al., 2007). The WBSF significantly differs between control and treatment groups depending on HIU. The treatment WBSF value was significantly lower than the control WBSF value except W7D14 (p<0.05). Both the control and treatment decreased WBSF values during the aging period. According to recent studies, using US technology on bovine muscles improved tenderness by decreasing WBSF over the aging period (Caraveo-Suarez et al., 2021; Chang et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2023a; Ojha et al., 2016; Siró et al., 2009; Xiong et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2010). The increased tenderness was mostly caused by the disintegration of myofibrillar protein structures, collagen macromolecules, and the migration of proteins, minerals, and other substances within the muscle (Stadnik and Dolatowski, 2011). The most significant sono-mechanical impact and cavitation, which damages mitochondria and starts apoptosis, has been shown by researchers to be triggered by applying HIU to meat (Awad et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2013). It was established that US treatment has an advantageous impact on the tenderness of beef meat all over the aging process (Wang et al., 2018). In a different study US pretreatment on chicken breast exhibited a notable decrease in shear force when compared to the control group (Shi et al., 2020). Consequently, there was a significant enhancement in the softness of meat. A significant reduction in shear force value was observed when applying 15 kHz US treatment to pork loin (de Lima Alves et al., 2018). Furthermore, the fibrillar index also increased. The frequency of US treatment is responsible for the tenderness of meat (Chang et al., 2015). Studies revealed the most pronounced shear force within the 20 to 200 kHz frequency range in meat (Leong et al., 2009). US studies discovered variable results with respect to shear force and tenderization in meat with respect of species, frequency, and specific equipment used (McDonnell et al., 2014).

kosfa-44-4-899-g3
Fig. 3. Changes in Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) of pork loins treated ultrasound during wet and dry combined aging. Bars indicate SEs of differences of the means (n=6). A–D Different letters within a red column (ultrasound-treated samples) indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05). a–e Different letters within a blue column (control samples) indicate significantly different (p<0.05). ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Download Original Figure
Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance

The assessment of lipid oxidation is crucial during novel techniques like HIU as there is a chance of generating oxidative chemicals through cavitation in the muscle cells (Pérez-Andrés et al., 2018). Fig. 4 illustrates the variation in TBARS of pork loin meat during the process of wet-dry combined aging and HIU. The TBARS assay was utilized as an experimental technique to quantify the oxidative degradation of meat resulting from free radical reactions. These reactions were induced by the fragmentation of myofibrils, disruption of protein structure, and oxidation of protein (Lee et al., 2023a). The aging period also contributed to free radical generation and the breakdown of fat and fat-like molecules (Jayasooriya et al., 2007). The treatment TBARS values were significantly higher than the control values during all aging periods, both significance of the aging period and HIU application (p<0.05). This result aligns with the prior research studies that demonstrated that the application of US to meat and meat products enhanced the process of lipid oxidation (Chang and Wong, 2012; Kang et al., 2016). It was expected that the HIU would lead to rapid oxidation of meat due to heat generation inside the meat. Furthermore, the oxidation of meat was influenced by the combined effect of HIU application and wet-dry aging. It was anticipated that the degree of oxidation would be greater when HIU application was employed compared to when solely wet-dry aging of meat was employed. As an exception a US study along with brine-cured aging by Inguglia et al. (2020) found no alterations in TBARS value at the end of storage.

kosfa-44-4-899-g4
Fig. 4. Changes in thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) of pork loins treated ultrasound during wet and dry combined aging. Bars indicate SEs of differences of the means (n=6). A–E Different letters within a red column (ultrasound-treated samples) indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05). a–f Different letters within a blue column (control samples) indicate significantly different (p<0.05). *** p<0.001.
Download Original Figure

Conclusion

The present study suggested that physicochemical changes and oxidation in pork loin are due to HIU treatment and wet-dry combined aging. The synergistic effect of HIU and wet-dry combined aging was found to reduce WBSF significantly, but the degree of oxidation of meat was found to increase. In agreement with the above result, applying wet aging for 14 d and dry aging for 3 to 7 d after applying HIU would be optimal. The reason was that heat is generated when HIU is applied to meat, and the meat protein is denatured, reducing WHC. Nevertheless, research has demonstrated that the pH and water retention capacity are enhanced with the process of aging. Additionally, the tenderness and oxidation level balance were found to be appropriate. In additional research, it is expected that it will be necessary to study the change in tenderness in detail when wet aging for 14 and dry aging for 3 to 7 d. Recent studies have shown that HIU and aging are also effective in improving taste, which will also be studied.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1I1A2069379 & 2023R1A2C1004867).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Seo JK, Kim CB, Choi JH, Joo ST. Data curation: Son YM, Lee EY. Formal analysis: Alam AN, Hwang YH, Kim CB, Choi JH. Methodology: Son YM, Alam AN, Seo JK. Software: Son YM, Lee EY, Alam AN. Validation: Alam AN, Seo JK, Joo ST. Investigation: Kim CB, Choi JH, Joo ST. Writing - original draft: Son YM, Lee EY. Writing - review & editing: Son YM, Lee EY, Alam AN, Samad A, Hossain MJ, Hwang YH, Seo JK, Kim CB, Choi JH, Joo ST.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Alam AN, Kim CJ, Kim SH, Kumari S, Lee SY, Hwang YH, Joo ST. 2024; Trends in hybrid cultured meat manufacturing technology to improve sensory characteristics. Food Sci Anim Resour. 44:39-50

2.

Alarcon-Rojo AD, Carrillo-Lopez LM, Reyes-Villagrana R, Huerta-Jiménez M, Garcia-Galicia IA. 2019; Ultrasound and meat quality: A review. Ultrason Sonochem. 55:369-382

3.

Alarcon-Rojo AD, Janacua H, Rodriguez JC, Paniwnyk L, Mason TJ. 2015; Power ultrasound in meat processing. Meat Sci. 107:86-93

4.

Al-Hilphy AR, Al-Temimi AB, Al Rubaiy HHM, Anand U, Delgado-Pando G, Lakhssassi N. 2020; Ultrasound applications in poultry meat processing: A systematic review. J Food Sci. 85:1386-1396

5.

Arowolo FK, Yang X, Blaser ME, Nicholson AM, Hosokawa E, Booth JR, Jobsis CT, Russell RL, Meudt JJ, Reichert JL, Crenshaw TD. 2020; Presence of lipid oxidation products in swine diet lowers pork quality and stability during storage. Meat Sci. 160:107946

6.

Ashokkumar M. 2011; The characterization of acoustic cavitation bubbles: An overview. Ultrason Sonochem. 18:864-872

7.

Awad TS, Moharram HA, Shaltout OE, Asker D, Youssef MM. 2012; Applications of ultrasound in analysis, processing and quality control of food: A review. Food Res Int. 48:410-427

8.

Bekhit AED, Faustman C. 2005; Metmyoglobin reducing activity. Meat Sci. 71:407-439

9.

Buege JA, Aust SD. 1978; Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol. 52:302-310

10.

Campbell RE, Hunt MC, Levis P, Chambers E. 2001; Dry-aging effects on palatability of beef longissimus muscle. J Food Sci. 66:196-199

11.

Caraveo O, Alarcon-Rojo AD, Renteria A, Santellano E, Paniwnyk L. 2015; Physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of beef treated with high-intensity ultrasound and stored at 4°C. J Sci Food Agric. 95:2487-2493

12.

Caraveo-Suarez RO, Garcia-Galicia IA, Santellano-Estrada E, Carrillo-Lopez LM, Huerta-Jimenez M, Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Alarcon-Rojo AD. 2021; High-frequency focused ultrasound on quality traits of bovine triceps brachii muscle. Foods. 10:2074

13.

Cárcel JA, Benedito J, Bon J, Mulet A. 2007; High intensity ultrasound effects on meat brining. Meat Sci. 76:611-619

14.

Chang H, Wong R. 2012; Textural and biochemical properties of cobia (Rachycentron canadum) sashimi tenderised with the ultrasonic water bath. Food Chem. 132:1340-1345

15.

Chang HJ, Wang Q, Tang CH, Zhou GH. 2015; Effects of ultrasound treatment on connective tissue collagen and meat quality of beef semitendinosus muscle. J Food Qual. 38:256-267

16.

Chemat F, Zill-e-Huma Khan MK. 2011; Applications of ultrasound in food technology: Processing, preservation and extraction. Ultrason Sonochem. 18:813-835

17.

de Lima Alves L, da Silva MS, Flores DRM, Athayde DR, Ruviaro AR, da Silva Brum D, Batista VSF, de Oliveira Mello R, de Menezes CR, Campagnol PCB, Wagner R, Barin JS, Cichoski AJ. 2018; Effect of ultrasound on the physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of Italian salami. Food Res Int. 106:363-373

18.

Delgado-Pando G, Ekonomou SI, Stratakos AC, Pintado T. 2021; Clean label alternatives in meat products. Foods. 10:1615

19.

Dolatowski Z, Stasiak DM, Latoch A. 2000; Effect of ultrasound processing of meat before freezing on its texture after thawing. Electron J Pol Agric Univ. 3:#02.

20.

Dorel-Petru Ţ, Corina B, Claudia JP, Alina B, Daniela R. 2016; Nutritional and metabolic diseases cause premature deaths in Bihor county?. Anal Univ Oradea, Fascicula Ecotoxicol Zoot Tehnol Ind Alimentara. XV/B:339-344.

21.

Gómez-Salazar JA, Ochoa-Montes DA, Cerón-García A, Ozuna C, Sosa-Morales ME. 2018; Effect of acid marination assisted by power ultrasound on the quality of rabbit meat. J Food Qual. 2018:5754930

22.

Hwang SI, Hong GP. 2020; Effects of high pressure in combination with the type of aging on the eating quality and biochemical changes in pork loin. Meat Sci. 162:108028

23.

Inguglia ES, Granato D, Kerry JP, Tiwari BK, Burgess CM. 2020; Ultrasound for meat processing: Effects of salt reduction and storage on meat quality parameters. Appl Sci. 11:117

24.

Inguglia ES, Zhang Z, Burgess C, Kerry JP, Tiwari BK. 2018; Influence of extrinsic operational parameters on salt diffusion during ultrasound assisted meat curing. Ultrasonics. 83:164-170

25.

Jayasooriya SD, Torley PJ, D’Arcy BR, Bhandari BR. 2007; Effect of high power ultrasound and ageing on the physical properties of bovine Semitendinosus and Longissimus muscles. Meat Sci. 75:628-639

26.

Joo ST, Choi JS, Hur SJ, Kim GD, Kim CJ, Lee EY, Bakhsh A, Hwang YH. 2022; A comparative study on the taste characteristics of satellite cell cultured meat derived from chicken and cattle muscles. Food Sci Anim Resour. 42:175-185

27.

Kang D, Zou Y, Cheng Y, Xing L, Zhou G, Zhang W. 2016; Effects of power ultrasound on oxidation and structure of beef proteins during curing processing. Ultrason Sonochem. 33:47-53

28.

Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation. 2021 2021 Animal products grading statistical yearbook. Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation. Sejong, Korea: .

29.

Korean Statistical Information Service [KOSIS]. 2022. Number of farms and animal of pig by city/breeding scale. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1EO311&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=F1A_12_10&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLEAccessed at Jan 2, 2024.

30.

Lee EY, Rathnayake D, Son YM, Bakhsh A, Hwang YH, Seo JK, Kim CB, Joo ST. 2023a; Effect of novel high-intensity ultrasound technique on physio-chemical, sensory attributes, and microstructure of bovine semitendinosus muscle. Food Sci Anim Resour. 43:85-100

31.

Lee SY, Kang JH, Lee DY, Jeong JW, Kim JH, Moon SS, Hur SJ. 2023b; Methods for improving meat protein digestibility in older adults. J Anim Sci Technol. 65:32-56

32.

Leong TSH, Wooster TJ, Kentish SE, Ashokkumar M. 2009; Minimising oil droplet size using ultrasonic emulsification. Ultrason Sonochem. 16:721-727

33.

Leroy B, Lambotte S, Dotreppe O, Lecocq H, Istasse L, Clinquart A. 2004; Prediction of technological and organoleptic properties of beef Longissimus thoracis from near-infrared reflectance and transmission spectra. Meat Sci. 66:45-54

34.

Li B, Zhong M, Sun Y, Liang Q, Shen L, Qayum A, Rashid A, Rehman A, Ma H, Ren X. 2024; Recent advancements in the utilization of ultrasonic technology for the curing of processed meat products: A comprehensive review. Ultrason Sonochem. 103:106796

35.

McDonnell CK, Lyng JG, Arimi JM, Allen P. 2014; The acceleration of pork curing by power ultrasound: A pilot-scale production. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 26:191-198

36.

Miles CA, Morley MJ, Rendell M. 1999; High power ultrasonic thawing of frozen foods. J Food Eng. 39:151-159

37.

Mungure TE, Farouk MM, John Birch E, Carne A, Staincliffe M, Stewart I, Bekhit AEDA. 2020; Effect of PEF treatment on meat quality attributes, ultrastructure and metabolite profiles of wet and dry aged venison Longissimus dorsi muscle. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 65:102457

38.

Ojha KS, Keenan DF, Bright A, Kerry JP, Tiwari BK. 2016; Ultrasound assisted diffusion of sodium salt replacer and effect on physicochemical properties of pork meat. Int J Food Sci Technol. 51:37-45

39.

Park Y, Ko E, Park K, Woo C, Kim J, Lee S, Park S, Kim Y, Park G, Choi J. 2022; Correlation between the Korean pork grade system and the amount of pork primal cut estimated with AutoFom III. J Anim Sci Technol. 64:135-142

40.

Peña-Gonzalez E, Alarcon-Rojo AD, Garcia-Galicia I, Carrillo-Lopez L, Huerta-Jimenez M. 2019; Ultrasound as a potential process to tenderize beef: Sensory and technological parameters. Ultrason Sonochem. 53:134-141

41.

Peña-González EM, Alarcón-Rojo AD, Rentería A, García I, Santellano E, Quintero A, Luna L. 2017; Quality and sensory profile of ultrasound-treated beef. Ital J Food Sci. 29:463-475.

42.

Pérez-Andrés JM, Charoux CMG, Cullen PJ, Tiwari BK. 2018; Chemical modifications of lipids and proteins by nonthermal food processing technologies. J Agric Food Chem. 66:5041-5054

43.

Rudy M, Kucharyk S, Duma-Kocan P, Stanisławczyk R, Gil M. 2020; Unconventional methods of preserving meat products and their impact on health and the environment. Sustainability. 12:5948

44.

SAS. 2002 SAS/STAT Software for PC. SAS Institute. Cary, NC, USA: .

45.

Shi H, Zhang X, Chen X, Fang R, Zou Y, Wang D, Xu W. 2020; How ultrasound combined with potassium alginate marination tenderizes old chicken breast meat: Possible mechanisms from tissue to protein. Food Chem. 328:127144

46.

Sikes AL, Mawson R, Stark J, Warner R. 2014; Quality properties of pre- and post-rigor beef muscle after interventions with high frequency ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem. 21:2138-2143

47.

Singla M, Sit N. 2021; Application of ultrasound in combination with other technologies in food processing: A review. Ultrason Sonochem. 73:105506

48.

Siró I, Vén C, Balla C, Jónás G, Zeke I, Friedrich L. 2009; Application of an ultrasonic assisted curing technique for improving the diffusion of sodium chloride in porcine meat. J Food Eng. 91:353-362

49.

Smith RD, Nicholson KL, Nicholson JDW, Harris KB, Miller RK, Griffin DB, Savell JW. 2008; Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer palatability evaluations of steaks from US choice and US select short loins. Meat Sci. 79:631-639

50.

Stadnik J, Dolatowski ZJ. 2011; Influence of sonication on Warner-Bratzler shear force, colour and myoglobin of beef (M. semimembranosus). Eur Food Res Technol. 233:553-559

51.

Stadnik J, Dolatowski ZJ, Baranowska HM. 2008; Effect of ultrasound treatment on water holding properties and microstructure of beef (m. semimembranosus) during ageing. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 41:2151-2158

52.

Stenström H, Li X, Hunt MC, Lundström K. 2014; Consumer preference and effect of correct or misleading information after ageing beef longissimus muscle using vacuum, dry ageing, or a dry ageing bag. Meat Sci. 96:661-666

53.

Terjung N, Witte F, Heinz V. 2021; The dry aged beef paradox: Why dry aging is sometimes not better than wet aging. Meat Sci. 172:108355

54.

Wang A, Kang D, Zhang W, Zhang C, Zou Y, Zhou G. 2018; Changes in calpain activity, protein degradation and microstructure of beef M. semitendinosus by the application of ultrasound. Food Chem. 245:724-730

55.

Xiong G, Zhang L, Zhang W, Wu J. 2012; Influence of ultrasound and proteolytic enzyme inhibitors on muscle degradation, tenderness, and cooking loss of hens during aging. Czech J Food Sci. 30:195-205

56.

Yu S, Zhang Y, Ge Y, Zhang Y, Sun T, Jiao Y, Zheng XQ. 2013; Effects of ultrasound processing on the thermal and retrogradation properties of nonwaxy rice starch. J Food Process Eng. 36:793-802

57.

Zhang F, Zhao H, Cao C, Kong B, Xia X, Liu Q. 2021; Application of temperature-controlled ultrasound treatment and its potential to reduce phosphate content in frankfurter-type sausages by 50%. Ultrason Sonochem. 71:105379

58.

Zhang Y, Abatzoglou N. 2020; Review: Fundamentals, applications and potentials of ultrasound-assisted drying. Chem Eng Res Des. 154:21-46

59.

Zheng L, Sun DW. 2006; Innovative applications of power ultrasound during food freezing processes: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 17:16-23

60.

Zhou GH, Xu XL, Liu Y. 2010; Preservation technologies for fresh meat: A review. Meat Sci. 86:119-128