Article

Consumer preferences for conventional meat and meat alternatives

Jae Bong Chang *
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Food Marketing and Safety, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05091, Korea.
*Corresponding Author: Jae Bong Chang. E-mail: jbchang@konkuk.ac.kr.

© Copyright 2024 Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 02, 2024 ; Revised: Oct 01, 2024 ; Accepted: Oct 01, 2024

Published Online: Oct 08, 2024

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in non-animal-based protein sources, little is known about consumer preferences for new meat alternatives. This study examines consumer attitudes toward canned ham made from domestic Handon pork, lab-grown, and plant-based protein. Using choice experiment data from a nationwide online survey of 1,000 South Korean consumers, the results of a random parameter logit analysis indicate that the consumers have the highest mean willingness-to-pay for canned ham made from Handon pork and the lowest mean willingness-to-pay for lab-grown canned ham. Despite the growing interest in non-animal-based protein sources, consumers prefer real meat over other meat alternatives. Additionally, the results indicate that consumers have a lower level of subjective knowledge regarding meat alternatives, and more people oppose having meat alternatives labeled as “meat.”

Keywords: discrete choice experiment; lab-grown meat; meat alternatives; plant-based meat; willingness-to-pay