ARTICLE

The Effect of Gelatin Coating and Sonication on the Quality Properties of Wet-Aging Pork Loins

Yea-Ji Kim1,2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-5100, Tae-Jun Jung2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-6666, Tae-Kyung Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6349-4314, Jae Hoon Lee1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-6842, Dong-Min Shin1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-433X, Hwan Hee Yu3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5740-862X, Yun-Sang Choi1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-6237
Author Information & Copyright
1Research Group of Food Processing, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea
2Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
3Food Standard Research Center, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea
*Corresponding author: Yun-Sang Choi, Research Group of Food Processing, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea, Tel: +82-63-219-9387, Fax: +82-63-219-9076, E-mail: kcys0517@kfri.re.kr

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 01, 2022 ; Revised: Nov 18, 2022 ; Accepted: Nov 29, 2022

Published Online: Mar 01, 2023

Abstract

In this study, we evaluate the effect of gelatin coating and sonication of wet-aged pork loin on quality. The moisture content of wet-aged pork loin with sonication and gelatin coating was the highest in the G5S sample (5% gelatin coating and sonication), while the moisture content of wet-aged pork loin with sonication was higher than that without sonication. The pH of wet-aged pork loin with sonication was lower than that without sonication. The aging loss of 5% gelatin coating with sonication was significantly lower than that of G0 (control), while the cooking loss was the lowest in G0 wet-aged pork loin. The water holding capacity of the wet-aged pork loin was the highest in G1. The thiobarbituric acid reactive substances value of wet-aged pork loin was significantly decreased with coating and not affected by sonication. The gelatin coating and sonication treatment significantly increased the myofibrillar fragmentation index of the samples. Shear force of wet-aged pork loin significantly decreased as the samples were gelatin-coated and sonicated. The myofibrillar and total protein solubilities were not significantly different between samples. In conclusion, the 1% gelatin coating with sonication can enhance the quality of wet-aged pork loin.

Keywords: gelatin; sonication; wet-aging; pork loin; quality properties

Introduction

Fresh meat tenderness and stability have been studied and are considered the most important qualitative components (Alexandre et al., 2021). The quality of fresh meat decreases even when refrigerated (Kim et al., 2020). To increase meat tenderness and improve flavor, wet-aging technology has been widely used (Hwang and Hong, 2020).

Wet-aging can produce tender meat products since the meat structure is decomposed during aging, thereby affecting tenderness (Hwang et al., 2018). However, the aging time and abundant water in wet-aged meat product can accelerate deteriorations, thereby inducing protein and lipid oxidation during cooking or storage (Ali et al., 2021; Ismail et al., 2008). There are various techniques to inhibit or delay meat oxidation, such as addition of antioxidant, packaging methods, and application of coating (Kim et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013). The plant antioxidants like essential oil are preferred by consumer compared with synthetic antioxidants, and effectively inhibited oxidation. However, their distinct scent differed from meaty aroma can lead to the resistance to intake (Pateiro et al., 2018). Thus, the adequate process for preventing oxidation without compromise of quality is needed.

The coating can act as a barrier to oxygen and water, without negatively affecting the structure and aroma of meat. The coating solution can be made of polysaccharide, protein, and lipid; the material of coating solution influences the trait (Shin et al., 2022). Gelatin has high film forming ability, hence is suitable as edible coating on meat products (Jridi et al., 2018) and can reduce purge loss, color deterioration, and lipid oxidation of meat, thereby extending the shelf-life (Antoniewski and Barringer, 2010). For the application of coating to the meat, the concentration of coating solution is important, because it can influence the adherence to the meat surface, stability, and visible attributes (Bhagath and Manjula, 2019).

Recently, the use of high-intensity ultrasound to provoke changes in the chemical and physical properties of meat has emerged (Delgado et al., 2008). This technology can improve tenderness via microstructure changes, with minimal damage to meat, although varying results have been reported (Alarcon-Rojo et al., 2015). Specifically, there are mainly two conditions of ultrasound in the food industry: First, ultrasound was used at high frequencies (2–10 MHz) and low power (up to 10 W), a method used in the food market as it is non-destructive to the cell walls, although the effectivity rate was low (Soria and Villamiel, 2010). Second, ultrasound was used at low frequencies (20–100 kHz) and high power (100–10,000 W), which accelerates certain chemical reactions via microstructure alterations (Jayasooriya et al., 2004; Jayasooriya et al., 2007). In previous research, the sonication before the aging of meat has accelerated the proteolysis during the aging, and it has improved the tenderness (Stadnik et al., 2014).

There is little research on the effects of gelatin coating and sonication on the quality of wet-aged meat. Also, the proper concentration of gelation coating for wet-aged meat is not yet identified. Therefore, the objectives of this study are to determine the most suitable concentration combinations of gelatin and the effect of ultrasonic processing for manufacturing high quality wet-aged meat. Changes in microstructure influence meat quality and texture properties and can be demonstrated by correlating gelatin coatings with ultrasound.

Materials and Methods

Aging pork loin

Pork loins (longissimus lumborum) from castrated boars (Landrace×Yorkshire×Duroc) were obtained from a local processor, 48 h post-mortem. The pork loin was trimmed of all visible fat and cut into a regular form (thickness 3 cm) vertically to the pork loin muscle fiber direction. A total of six different treatments were then produced; the experimental design and formulation of each sample are listed in Table 1. The control wet-aged pork loin (G0) was formulated without a gelatin coating and sonication. The G0S treatment included only sonication. The other experimental treatments of wet-aged pork loins were formulated with gelatin coating. Gelatin coating and sonication were used as follows: G1, with 1% gelatin coating; G1S, with 1% gelatin coating and sonication; G5, with 5% gelatin coating; G5S, with 5% gelatin coating and sonication. First, the G1, G1S, G5, and G5S were soaked in 1% or 5% gelatin solution for 1 min, and surface of coated samples was dried at 25°C for 10 min. After that, all the slice of pork loins, including G0 and G0S, was vacuum packed. G0S, G1S, and G5S were sonicated using ultrasonic bath (CPX5900H-E, Emerson, Danbury, CT, USA), with 40 kHz and 160 W, for 30 min. After all these progresses, treatments were wet-aged for five days at a temperature below 10°C. The wet-aging of 30 meat blocks was conducted as triplicate.

Table 1. Formulation percentage of wet-aged pork loins with gelatin coating and sonication
G0 G0S G1 G1S G5 G5S
Pork loin 100 100 100 100 100 100
Gelatin coating (%) - - 1 1 5 5
Sonication X O X O X O

G0 (control), without gelatin coating and sonication; G0S, non-gelatin coated with sonication; G1, 1% gelatin-coated without sonication; G1S, 1% gelatin-coated with sonication; G5, 5% gelatin-coated without sonication; G5S, 5% gelatin-coated with sonication.

Download Excel Table
Moisture content, pH, and color

The moisture content of the samples was analyzed via the AOAC methodology (950.46B; AOAC, 2000), using a drying oven (SAB-150, Haneul Science, Taebaek, Korea). The pH values of the samples were determined on a homogenate prepared with wet-aged pork loin sample (5 g) and 20 mL distilled water using a pH meter (Model 360, Mettler-Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). The color (CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b*) of the wet-aged pork loin sample was determined using a colorimeter (Minolta Chroma meter CR-410, Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan) that was calibrated with a white plate (CIE L*=+97.83, CIE a* =–0.43, CIE b*=+1.98, illuminate C).

Aging loss, cooking loss, and water holding capacity (WHC)

Initially, the raw samples were weighed prior to the aging process, following which the wet-aging was progressed for 5 days. The wet-aged samples were re-weighed after a gentle swipe on the surface to remove the drip and coating solution. The aging loss percentage (%) was calculated using the weight difference between the raw and aged samples.

The weighed samples after the measurement of aging loss were put into unsealed thermostable plastic bag and cooked in water bath at 75°C for 1 h. After cooking, the cooking loss (%) was determined by the weight difference between uncooked and cooked wet-aged samples. WHC (%) was estimated by determining the expressible juice according to the filter paper press method (Kim et al., 2019). WHC was determined by calculating the released moisture content.

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)

The samples were analyzed for TBARS using the methods established by Tarladgis et al. (1960) with minor modifications. Samples (10 g) were homogenized in distilled water (50 mL) for 2 min and transferred to a round flask with distilled water added (47.5 mL); 4 N HCl (2.5 mL) was added to the round flask with an antifoam agent and silicone o/w and distilled to a 50 mL distillate. A 0.02 M 2-thiobarbituric acid in 90% acetic acid (5 mL) was mixed with the distillate (5 mL) in a vial, capped, and heated (100°C, 30 min) to develop chromogen; the absorbance was determined at 538 nm. The value of TBARS was expressed as mg malondialdehyde/kg meat and it was calculated using conversion factor with 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane and its recovery (Merlo et al., 2020; Tarladgis et al., 1960).

Myofibrillar protein fragmentation index (MFI) and Warner–Bratzler shear force

The MFI was determined as previously reported (Culler et al., 1978). Samples were extracted with MFI buffer solution, and the absorbance of the extract (0.5 mg protein/mL) was determined at 540 nm. The Warner–Bratzler shear force was determined using a TA-XT2i (Stable Micro System, Scarsdale, NY, USA) equipped with a Warner–Bratzler blade operating at a crosshead speed of 150 mm/min.

Protein solubility

The protein solubility (sarcoplasmic protein, myofibrillar protein, and total protein) of the wet-aged pork loin samples was determined using Kim et al. (2022) methods, while the sarcoplasmic protein solubility was determined using the Biuret method (Gornall et al., 1949). The wet-aged pork loin sample (2 g) and ice-cold 25 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2; 20 mL) were homogenized on ice and left to stand on a shaker overnight at 4°C. The mixtures were then centrifuged at 1,500×g for 20 min and the protein concentrations of the supernatants were determined. Total protein solubility was determined by homogenizing the wet-aged pork loin sample (2 g) in ice-cold 1.1 mol/L potassium iodide in a 100 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.2; 20 mL). Homogenization, shaking, centrifugation, and protein determination procedures are described as previous sarcoplasmic protein solubility. Myofibrillar protein solubility was determined using the difference between the total and sarcoplasmic protein solubilities.

Statistical analysis

All experimental data were analyzed with the SPSS statistics 20 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) using a completely randomized design. The Duncan’s range test was performed to determine the significant differences (p<0.05) and general linear model procedure was applied for identifying the interaction effect of coating and sonication. All experiments were proceeded at least three replicates. To compare the effects of wet-aging method, it was considered a fixed effect, and each replicate was considered a random effect.

Results and Discussion

Moisture, pH, and color of wet-aged pork loin

Table 2 presents the moisture, pH, and color results of wet-aged pork loin with sonication and a gelatin coating. The moisture content of wet-aged pork loin with sonication and gelatin coating was the highest in the G5S sample (p<0.05), while the moisture content with sonication was higher (p<0.05) than that without sonication. Ultrasound treatment can improve moisture transport (Ozuna et al., 2013). Therefore, the moisture of coating solution may be transported to the meat via sonication. Jridi et al. (2018) have reported that gelatin coating of beef meat prevent moisture loss, while Antoniewski and Barringer (2010) indicated that the gelatin coating of fresh meat products decreased purge and purge loss in fresh meat since it acts as a water barrier. Chang et al. (2015) have reported that the water loss rate of sonicated beef increased with increasing ultrasound exposure. The results of this study indicated that the moisture content of control was not significantly different with 1% gelatin-coated wet-aged pork loin, but that moisture loss could be reduced when coated with 5% gelatin or sonication to uncoated pork loin.

Table 2. Effects of gelatin coating with/without sonication on the physicochemical properties of wet-aged pork loins
Traits G0 G0S G1 G1S G5 G5S
Moisture content (%) 58.52±0.27c 60.71±0.11b 57.63±0.08d 58.15±0.34cd 60.51±0.04b 61.28±0.16a
pH 5.71±0.01d 5.64±0.02e 5.89±0.01a 5.80±0.01c 5.84±0.02b 5.81±0.01c
CIE L* 54.38±0.25d 62.53±0.12a 52.35±0.28e 61.05±0.32b 48.79±0.18f 55.23±0.24c
CIE a* 6.64±0.23a 5.16±0.33cd 5.98±0.12ab 3.46±0.28e 5.68±0.23bc 4.55±0.35d
CIE b* 5.17±0.16b 6.07±0.31a 5.33±0.19b 5.47±0.26ab 3.84±0.11c 4.20±0.15c
Significance of coating, sonication, and their interactions
Moisture content (%) pH CIE L* CIE a* CIE b*
Coating *** *** *** *** ***
Sonication ** NS *** *** **
Interaction effect (coating×sonication) * *** *** *** NS

Mean±SE of three replicates is presented.

a–f Different letters indicate a significant difference (p<0.05).

* p<0.05,

** p<0.01,

*** p<0.001.

G0 (control), without gelatin coating and sonication; G0S, non-gelatin coated with sonication; G1, 1% gelatin-coated without sonication; G1S, 1% gelatin-coated with sonication; G5, 5% gelatin-coated without sonication; G5S, 5% gelatin-coated with sonication; NS, not significant.

Download Excel Table Download Excel Table

The pH of wet-aged pork loin was increased by 1% gelatin coating (p<0.05), while the pH of wet-aged pork loin with 5% gelatin coating decreased. The ultrasonic treatment decreased the pH values in uncoated and 1% gelatin coated meat, however it enhanced the pH of 5% gelatin coated sample. Hereby, the gelatin concentration of coating and sonication are important factors to determine pH of meat. Jridi et al. (2018) have reported that the pH of beef meat with gelatin coating maintains pH values for eight days, while Stadnik and Dolatowski (2011) found that the pH of beef did not significantly differ between those treated with and without ultrasound, and that the pH of beef treated with ultrasound tended to increase with increasing aging time. In our study, the gelatin molecules in coating solution might immersed into the muscle by sonication and it can influence the pH decline. The sonication treatment can induce change of pH by decomposing the part of gelatin in coating solution and meat protein in pork loin (Jamalabadi et al., 2019). The pH variation by sonication can be affected by muscle type or sonication time (Valenzuela et al., 2021), thus it showed different tendency with previous study.

The CIE L* and CIE a* of wet-aged pork loin with a gelatin coating were lower (p<0.05) than that of G0, while the CIE L* of wet-aged pork loin with sonication was higher (p<0.05) than that of the samples without sonication. However, the CIE a* of wet-aged pork loin with sonication was lower (p<0.05) than that of the samples without sonication. The decreased CIE a* of sonicated treatments is caused by the metmyoglobin formation (Tang et al., 2006). The CIE a* of meat was usually decreased during the aging (Kim et al., 2018). Thus, the color preservation strategy might be needed for application of ultrasonic treatment. The CIE b* of wet-aged pork loin with sonication was higher (p<0.05) than that of the samples without sonication. The 5% gelatin coating was sharply decreased the CIE b* of wet-aged pork loin. Jridi et al. (2018) reported that the CIE b* of beef meat coated with gelatin was higher than uncoated sample after 3 days of storage. This difference can be also caused by the penetration of small molecules of gelatin in the high concentration of coating solution. Consequently, chromaticity of samples in this study might have been affected during wet-aging by gelatin coating and ultrasound.

Aging loss, cooking loss, and water holding capacity (WHC) of wet-aged pork loin

As shown in Table 3, there was no significant difference between samples if only the proportion of coating or state of sonication was different (p>0.05). The low moisture permeability caused by aging methods decreased water evaporation during aging (Shi et al., 2020). A previous study found that the sonication process before aging did not significantly affect the drip loss of meat (Jayasooriya et al., 2004).

Table 3. Effects of gelatin coating with/without sonication on aging loss, cooking loss, and water holding capacity (WHC) of wet-aged pork loins
Traits (%) G0 G0S G1 G1S G5 G5S
Aging loss 2.89±0.27a 2.58±0.20ab 2.45±0.30ab 2.41±0.12ab 2.47±0.06ab 1.95±0.41b
Cooking loss 36.15±0.23d 37.05±0.25c 36.89±0.17c 37.20±0.19c 40.32±0.20b 41.31±0.22a
WHC 47.93±0.62b 45.17±0.72c 51.83±0.72a 33.38±0.43d 31.15±0.75e 29.12±0.56f
Significance of coating, sonication, and their interactions
Aging loss Cooking loss WHC
Coating NS *** ***
Sonication NS *** ***
Interaction effect (coating×sonication) NS NS ***

Mean±SE of three replicates is presented.

a–f Different letters indicate a significant difference (p<0.05).

* p<0.05,

** p<0.01,

*** p<0.001.

G0 (control), without gelatin coating and sonication; G0S, non-gelatin coated with sonication; G1, 1% gelatin-coated without sonication; G1S, 1% gelatin-coated with sonication; G5, 5% gelatin-coated without sonication; G5S, 5% gelatin-coated with sonication; NS, not significant.

Download Excel Table Download Excel Table

The cooking loss of wet-aged pork loin is also shown in Table 3. The cooking loss of G5S (wet-aged pork loin with 5% gelatin coating and sonication) was highest among all samples. Meanwhile, the cooking loss of the sample without any coating and sonication was the lowest. This might be the reason that the gelatin molecules which absorbed during aging were released out from the meat structure by heating. During the heating, the molecular mobility of gelatin was increased and the hydrogen bonding between the meat structure and absorbed gelatin was weaken (Anvari and Chung, 2016). Therefore, the gelatin molecules were released from the meat with the water molecules, which bonded with gelatin. The sonication promoted protein degradation in muscle structure which can increase water loss upon cooking (Purslow et al., 2016). Nevertheless, protein degradation is directly associated with the tenderness of the meat, and one of the major purposes of aging (Wang et al., 2018). In summary, the increased cooking loss of pork loin was induced by gelatin coating and protein degradation via sonication during aging.

The WHC of the wet-aged pork loin was the lowest in the 5% gelatin-coated and sonicated sample (Table 3). The WHC is highly related to the cooking loss of meat as it is associated with proteolysis (Kim et al., 2018). During aging, myofibrils are degraded by enzymes, while intracellular water is leaked into the extracellular space. Meanwhile, the wet-aged pork loin coated with 1% gelatin without sonication showed the highest WHC. This might be due to the high pH of G1, which was far from the isoelectric pH of protein. Boakye and Mittal (1993) also reported a positive correlation between pH and WHC during aging. Thus, the high cooking loss and low WHC of G5S were attributed to protein degradation, while the high WHC of G1 was attributed to the high pH.

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) of wet-aged pork loin

TBARS have been used to evaluate the lipid oxidation of a meat product, and can affect the color, flavor, and texture of foods. During aging, structural changes in muscle can induce the production of malondialdehyde (Ali and Nam, 2021). The TBARS value of wet-aged pork loin was significantly decreased with coating (p<0.05) and not affected by sonication (p>0.05; Fig. 1, Table 4). Although all the treatments were identically vacuum packed, the coating significantly prevent the lipid oxidation of meat. The remained oxygen in package, even low concentration, might trigger the lipid oxidation of meat during the aging for 5 days. Also the cooking process of this study was performed in aerobic condition, thus the wet-aged meat was possible to oxidize during cooking. The coating of meat products is an effective method to prevent contact with water and oxygen (Duran and Kahve, 2020). The gelatin coating of pork meat investigated by previous studies showed high antioxidant activity (Gallego et al., 2020). Sonication treatments can generate free radicals, thereby accelerating lipid oxidation (Pinton et al., 2019). However, the ultrasound setting used in this study did not increase lipid oxidation. The similar result has been represented in previous study, where the ultrasound treatment did not affect the protein and lipid oxidation of meat emulsion (Cichoski et al., 2019). The protein structural changes derived from the sonication can determine the lipid oxidation (Cichoski et al., 2019). In this study, the coating with sonication might hinder the sonication-inducted transformation of protein structure, thus lipid oxidation of wet-aged pork loin can inhibit. Therefore, the gelatin coating with sonication of wet-aged pork loin effectively prevented lipid oxidation during aging.

kosfa-43-2-269-g1
Fig. 1. Effect of gelatin coating with/without sonication on thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) value of wet-aged pork loin. a,bDifferent letters indicate a significant difference (p<0.05). G0 (control), without gelatin coating and sonication; G0S, non-gelatin coated with sonication; G1, 1% gelatin-coated without sonication; G1S, 1% gelatin-coated with sonication; G5, 5% gelatin-coated without sonication; G5S, 5% gelatin-coated with sonication.
Download Original Figure
Table 4. The interaction effects of coating and sonication on thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) values, myofibrillar protein fragmentation index (MFI), shear force, and protein solubility of wet-aged pork loins
Significance of coating, sonication, and their interactions
TBARS MFI Shear force Total protein solubility Sarcoplasmic protein solubility Myofibrillar protein solubility
Coating *** ** *** NS NS NS
Sonication NS *** *** NS NS NS
Interaction effect (coating×sonication) NS NS NS NS NS NS

* p<0.05,

** p<0.01,

*** p<0.001.

Download Excel Table
Myofibrillar protein fragmentation index (MFI) and shear force of wet-aged pork loin

Myofibrillar protein fragmentation was affected by proteolysis during aging (Ali and Nam, 2021) and correlated with meat tenderization (Ilian et al., 2004). The MFI of wet-aged pork loin and the interaction effect of coating and sonication on MFI are shown in Fig. 2 and Table 4. The gelatin coating and sonication treatment significantly increased the MFI of the samples (p<0.05), regardless of coating proportion. Ultrasound treatment can break muscle cells and enhance enzymatic activity, thereby decreasing muscle fiber diameter (Alarcon-Rojo et al., 2015). Previous studies have reported similar results, wherein the ultrasound treatment to the pork loin increased the MFI, depending on treatment time (Yeung and Huang, 2017). Thus, the MFI results showed that the coated and sonicated wet-aged pork loin was considerably degraded.

kosfa-43-2-269-g2
Fig. 2. Effects of gelatin coating with/without sonication on myofibrillar protein fragmentation index (MFI) and shear force value of wet-aged pork loins. a–dDifferent letters indicate a significant difference (p<0.05). G0 (control), without gelatin coating and sonication; G0S, non-gelatin coated with sonication; G1, 1% gelatin-coated without sonication; G1S, 1% gelatin-coated with sonication; G5, 5% gelatin-coated without sonication; G5S, 5% gelatin-coated with sonication.
Download Original Figure

Shear force of wet-aged pork loin was significantly decreased as samples were coated and sonicated, although a shear force of 5% gelatin-coated samples was higher than that of 1% gelatin-coated samples (Fig. 2, Table 4, p<0.05). The shear force of meat was negatively correlated with myofibril fragmentation (Karumendu et al., 2009), which was induced by the low integrity of myofibril structure (Marino et al., 2013). In our study, the MFI was significantly increased by sonication (p<0.05), while previous findings have demonstrated that ultrasonic treatment could reduce the shear force values of muscles (Barekat and Soltanizadeh, 2017). Meanwhile, the reduced meat tenderness by the increased coating proportion in our study might have been attributed to water loss during cooking (Alexandre et al., 2021). The loss of water during cooking increased the stiffness of meat (Hughes et al., 2014), while high proportion coated samples showed high cooking loss and low water retention capacity compared to low proportion coated samples. Therefore, sonication with 1% gelatin coating significantly improved the tenderness of wet-aged pork loin.

Protein solubility of wet-aged pork loin

The protein solubility of wet-aged pork loin and the interaction effect of coating and sonication on protein solubility are presented in Fig. 3 and Table 4. The myofibrillar and total protein solubilities were not significantly different among the samples (p>0.05), although the sarcoplasmic protein solubility of G1 was higher than G0 (0.05). Sarcoplasmic proteins have no structural function, however influence water retention capacity (Marino et al., 2014). Using NMR, Li et al. (2018) observed that sarcoplasmic protein solubility positively correlated with immobilized water and negatively correlated with free water in muscle. Thus, an increase in sarcoplasmic protein solubility could have influenced the WHC of G1. Protein solubility can also be affected by denaturation, oxidation, and aggregation of proteins (Khan et al., 2016). The sonication treatment, which increased MFI in this study, did not improve the protein solubility. According to packaging methods, a significant difference in protein solubility of pork during storage has been previously reported (Chen et al., 2015). Therefore, the 1% gelatin coating of wet-aged pork loin increased the sarcoplasmic protein solubility, while sonication treatment had no significant effect on protein solubility.

kosfa-43-2-269-g3
Fig. 3. Effect of gelatin coating with/without sonication on protein solubility of wet-aged pork loins. a,bDifferent letters indicate a significant difference (p<0.05). G0 (control), without gelatin coating and sonication; G0S, non-gelatin coated with sonication; G1, 1% gelatin-coated without sonication; G1S, 1% gelatin-coated with sonication; G5, 5% gelatin-coated without sonication; G5S, 5% gelatin-coated with sonication.
Download Original Figure

Conclusion

In this study, gelatin coating and sonication of wet-aged pork loin affected the physicochemical properties, WHC, lipid oxidation, myofibril fragmentation, tenderness, and protein solubility. Gelatin coating improved meat quality by increasing the tenderness and decreasing lipid oxidation. However, the high proportion of coating (5%) can increase the cooking loss and shear force of wet-aged pork loin, by decreasing water retention capacity. The sonication improved the tenderness by accelerating the proteolysis and did not affect lipid oxidation. The G1 showed higher moisture content and WHC than G1S, however G1S represented the lowest shear force among the treatment which was influenced by MFI. Therefore, a 1% gelatin coating is certainly effective way to improve the quality of wet-aged pork loin, and the sonication treatment can be useful for enhancing the tenderness without oxidative damages.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E0211200-02) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (Korea).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Kim YJ, Jung TJ, Kim TK, Lee JH, Shin DM, Choi YS. Formal analysis: Kim YJ, Jung TJ, Kim TK, Lee JH, Shin DM, Yu HH, Choi YS. Methodology: Kim YJ, Choi YS. Investigation: Choi YS. Writing - original draft: Kim TK, Shin DM, Yu HH, Choi YS. Writing - review & editing: Kim YJ, Jung TJ, Kim TK, Lee JH, Shin DM, Yu HH, Choi YS.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Alarcon-Rojo AD, Janacua H, Rodriguez JC, Paniwnyk L, Mason TJ. 2015; Power ultrasound in meat processing. Meat Sci. 107:86-93

2.

Alexandre S, Vital ACP, Mottin C, do Prado RM, Ornaghi MG, Ramos TR, Guerrero A, Pilau EJ, do Prado IN. 2021; Use of alginate edible coating and basil (Ocimum spp.) extracts on beef characteristics during storage. J Food Sci Technol. 58:3835-3843

3.

Ali M, Nam KC. 2021; Physicochemical attributes, oxidative stability, and microbial profile of boneless sirloin and bone-in T-bone steaks from Hanwoo steer with reference to dry-aging. J Anim Sci Technol. 63:1169-1181

4.

Ali M, Park JY, Lee SY, Choi YS, Nam KC. 2021; Physicochemical and microbial characteristics of longissimus lumborum and biceps femoris muscles in Korean native black goat with wet-aging time. J Anim Sci Technol. 63:149-159

5.

Antoniewski MN, Barringer SA. 2010; Meat shelf-life and extension using collagen/gelatin coatings: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 50:644-653

6.

Anvari M, Chung D. 2016; Effect of cooling–heating rate on sol-gel transformation of fish gelatin–gum arabic complex coacervate phase. Int J Biol Macromol. 91:450-456

7.

AOAC. 2000 Official methods of analysis. 17th edAOAC International. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Method 950.46B.

8.

Barekat S, Soltanizadeh N. 2017; Improvement of meat tenderness by simultaneous application of high-intensity ultrasonic radiation and papain treatment. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 39:223-229

9.

Bhagath YB, Manjula K. 2019; Influence of composite edible coating systems on preservation of fresh meat cuts and products: A brief review on their trends and applications. Int Food Res J. 26:377-392.

10.

Boakye K, Mittal GS. 1993; Changes in pH and water holding properties of longissimus dorsi muscle during beef ageing. Meat Sci. 34:335-349

11.

Chang HJ, Wang Q, Tang CH, Zhou GH. 2015; Effects of ultrasound treatment on connective tissue collagen and meat quality of beef semitendinosus muscle. J Food Qual. 38:256-267

12.

Chen L, Zhou G, Zhang W. 2015; Effects of high oxygen packaging on tenderness and water holding capacity of pork through protein oxidation. Food Bioprocess Technol. 8:2287-2297

13.

Cichoski AJ, Silva MS, Leães YSV, Brasil CCB, de Menezes CR, Barin JS, Wagner R, Campagnol PCB. 2019; Ultrasound: A promising technology to improve the technological quality of meat emulsions. Meat Sci. 148:150-155

14.

Culler RD, Parrish FC, Smith GC, Cross HR. 1978; Relationship of myofibril fragmentation index to certain chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of bovine longissimus muscle. J Food Sci. 43:1177-1180

15.

Delgado AE, Zheng L, Sun DW. 2008; Influence of ultrasound on freezing rate of immersion-frozen apples. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2:263-270

16.

Duran A, Kahve HI. 2020; The effect of chitosan coating and vacuum packaging on the microbiological and chemical properties of beef. Meat Sci. 162:107961

17.

Gallego M, Arnal M, Talens P, Toldrá F, Mora L. 2020; Effect of gelatin coating enriched with antioxidant tomato by-products on the quality of pork meat. Polymers. 12:1032

18.

Gornall AG, Bardawill CJ, David MM. 1949; Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. J Biol Chem. 177:751-766

19.

Hughes JM, Oiseth SK, Purslow PP, Warner RD. 2014; A structural approach to understanding the interactions between colour, water-holding capacity and tenderness. Meat Sci. 98:520-532

20.

Hwang SI, Hong GP. 2020; Effects of high pressure in combination with the type of aging on the eating quality and biochemical changes in pork loin. Meat Sci. 162:108028

21.

Hwang YH, Sabikun N, Ismail I, Joo ST. 2018; Comparison of meat quality characteristics of wet- and dry-aging pork belly and shoulder blade. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 38:950-958

22.

Ilian MA, Bekhit AED, Bickerstaffe R. 2004; The relationship between meat tenderization, myofibril fragmentation and autolysis of calpain 3 during post-mortem aging. Meat Sci. 66:387-397

23.

Ismail HA, Lee EJ, Ko KY, Ahn DU. 2008; Effects of aging time and natural antioxidants on the color, lipid oxidation and volatiles of irradiated ground beef. Meat Sci. 80:582-591

24.

Jamalabadi M, Saremnezhad S, Bahrami A, Jafari SM. 2019; The influence of bath and probe sonication on the physicochemical and microstructural properties of wheat starch. Food Sci Nutr. 7:2427-2435

25.

Jayasooriya SD, Bhandari BR, Torley P, D’Arcy BR. 2004; Effect of high power ultrasound waves on properties of meat: A review. Int J Food Prop. 7:301-319

26.

Jayasooriya SD, Torley PJ, D’Arcy BR, Bhandari BR. 2007; Effect of high power ultrasound and ageing on the physical properties of bovine semitendinosus and longissimus muscles. Meat Sci. 75:628-639

27.

Jridi M, Mora L, Souissi N, Aristoy MC, Nasri M, Toldrá F. 2018; Effects of active gelatin coated with henna (L. inermis) extract on beef meat quality during chilled storage. Food Control. 84:238-245

28.

Karumendu LU, van de Ven R, Kerr MJ, Lanza M, Hopkins DL. 2009; Particle size analysis of lamb meat: Effect of homogenization speed, comparison with myofibrillar fragmentation index and its relationship with shear force. Meat Sci. 82:425-431

29.

Khan MI, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Young HI, Lee H, Jo C. 2016; Marination and physicochemical characteristics of vacuum-aged duck breast meat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 29:1639-1945

30.

Kim JH, Kim JH, Yoon DK, Ji DS, Jang HJ, Lee CH. 2018; A comparison of dry and wet aging on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of pork loin with two aging times. Food Sci Biotechnol. 27:1551-1559

31.

Kim JH, Kim TK, Shin DM, Kim HW, Kim YB, Choi YS. 2020; Comparative effects of dry-aging and wet-aging on physicochemical properties and digestibility of Hanwoo beef. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 33:501-505

32.

Kim SJ, Cho AR, Han J. 2013; Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of leafy green vegetable extracts and their applications to meat product preservation. Food Control. 29:112-120

33.

Kim TK, Kim YB, Jeon KH, Jang HW, Lee HS, Choi YS. 2019; Quality characteristics of Samgyetang according to the sodium chloride level and with/without phosphate in broth. Food Sci Anim Resour. 39:102-113

34.

Kim TK, Yong HI, Cha JY, Kim YJ, Jung S, Choi YS. 2022; Effects of protein functionality on myofibril protein-saccharide graft reaction. Food Sci Anim Resour. 42:849-860

35.

Li X, Wei X, Wang H, Zhang C, Mehmood W. 2018; Relationship between protein denaturation and water holding capacity of pork during postmortem ageing. Food Biophys. 13:18-24

36.

Marino R, Albenzio M, Della Malva A, Caroprese M, Santillo A, Sevi A. 2014; Changes in meat quality traits and sarcoplasmic proteins during aging in three different cattle breeds. Meat Sci. 98:178-186

37.

Marino R, Albenzio M, Della Malva A, Santillo A, Loizzo P, Sevi A. 2013; Proteolytic pattern of myofibrillar protein and meat tenderness as affected by breed and aging time. Meat Sci. 95:281-287

38.

Merlo TC, da Cruz Antonio J, Savian TV, Villegas C, Dargelio MDB, da Silva Pinto JS, de Alencar SM, Rodrigues ALR, Saldaña E, Contreras-Castillo CJ. 2020; Effect of the smoking using Brazilian reforestation woods on volatile organic compounds, lipid oxidation, microbiological and hedonic quality of bacons during shelf life. Meat Sci. 164:108110

39.

Ozuna C, Puig A, García-Pérez JV, Mulet A, Cárcel JA. 2013; Influence of high intensity ultrasound application on mass transport, microstructure and textural properties of pork meat (Longissimus dorsi) brined at different NaCl concentrations. J Food Eng. 119:84-93

40.

Pateiro M, Barba FJ, Domínguez R, Sant'Ana AS, Khaneghah AM, Gavahian M, Gómez B, Lorenzo JM. 2018; Essential oils as natural additives to prevent oxidation reactions in meat and meat products: A review. Food Res Int. 113:156-166

41.

Pinton MB, Correa LP, Facchi MMX, Heck RT, Leães YSV, Cichoski AJ, Lorenzo JM, dos Santos M, Pollonio MAR, Campagnol PCB. 2019; Ultrasound: A new approach to reduce phosphate content of meat emulsions. Meat Sci. 152:88-95

42.

Purslow PP, Oiseth S, Hughes J, Warner RD. 2016; The structural basis of cooking loss in beef: Variations with temperature and ageing. Food Res Int. 89:739-748

43.

Shi Y, Zhang W, Zhou G. 2020; Effects of different moisture-permeable packaging on the quality of aging beef compared with wet aging and dry aging. Foods. 9:649

44.

Shin DM, Kim YJ, Yune JH, Kim DH, Kwon HC, Sohn H, Han SG, Han JH, Lim SJ, Han SG. 2022; Effects of chitosan and duck fat-based emulsion coatings on the quality characteristics of chicken meat during storage. Foods. 11:245

45.

Soria AC, Villamiel M. 2010; Effect of ultrasound on the technological properties and bioactivity of food: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 21:323-331

46.

Stadnik J, Dolatowski ZJ. 2011; Influence of sonication on Warner-Bratzler shear force, colour and myoglobin of beef (m. semimembranosus). Eur Food Res Technol. 233:553-559

47.

Stadnik J, Stasiak DM, Dolatowski ZJ. 2014; Proteolysis in dry-aged loins manufactured with sonicated pork and inoculated with Lactobacillus casei ŁOCK 0900 probiotic strain. Int J Food Sci Technol. 49:2578-2584

48.

Tang J, Faustman C, Mancini RA, Seyfert M, Hunt MC. 2006; The effects of freeze–thaw and sonication on mitochondrial oxygen consumption, electron transport chain-linked metmyoglobin reduction, lipid oxidation, and oxymyoglobin oxidation. Meat Sci. 74:510-515

49.

Tarladgis BG, Watts BM, Younathan MT, Dugan L. 1960; A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 37:44-48

50.

Valenzuela C, Garcia-Galicia IA, Paniwnyk L, Alarcon-Rojo AD. 2021; Physicochemical characteristics and shelf life of beef treated with high-intensity ultrasound. J Food Process Preserv. 45e15350

51.

Wang A, Kang D, Zhang W, Zhang C, Zou Y, Zhou G. 2018; Changes in calpain activity, protein degradation and microstructure of beef M. semitendinosus by the application of ultrasound. Food Chem. 245:724-730

52.

Yeung CK, Huang SC. 2017; Effects of ultrasound pretreatment and ageing processing on quality and tenderness of pork loin. J Food Nutr Res. 5:809-816

53.

Zhang W, Xiao S, Ahn DU. 2013; Protein oxidation: Basic principles and implications for meat quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 53:1191-1201