REVIEW

Psychrotrophic Bacteria Threatening the Safety of Animal-Derived Foods: Characteristics, Contamination, and Control Strategies

Hyemin Oh1,2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-7242, Jeeyeon Lee3,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-6835
Author Information & Copyright
1Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea
2Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea
3Department of Food & Nutrition, Dong-eui University, Busan 47340, Korea
*Corresponding author : Jeeyeon Lee, Department of Food & Nutrition, Dong-eui University, Busan 47340, Korea, Tel: +82-51-890-1596, Fax: +82-505-182-6873, E-mail: jylee@deu.ac.kr

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jun 13, 2024 ; Revised: Jul 26, 2024 ; Accepted: Jul 26, 2024

Published Online: Sep 01, 2024

Abstract

Animal-derived foods, such as meat and dairy products, are prone to spoilage by psychrotrophic bacteria due to their high-water activity and nutritional value. These bacteria can grow at refrigerated temperatures, posing significant concerns for food safety and quality. Psychrotrophic bacteria, including Pseudomonas, Listeria, and Yersinia, not only spoil food but can also produce heat-resistant enzymes and toxins, posing health risks. This review examines the characteristics and species composition of psychrotrophic bacteria in animal-derived foods, their impact on food spoilage and safety, and contamination patterns in various products. It explores several nonthermal techniques to combat bacterial contamination as alternatives to conventional thermal methods, which can affect food quality. This review highlights the importance of developing nonthermal technologies to control psychrotrophic bacteria that threaten the cold storage of animal-derived foods. By adopting these technologies, the food industry can better ensure the safety and quality of animal-derived foods for consumers.

Keywords: animal-derived foods; psychrotrophic bacteria; prevalence; nonthermal techniques; food safety

Introduction

Animal-derived foods, such as meat, milk, and their processed products, generally have high water activity and nutritional value. Therefore, they are highly susceptible to spoilage by microorganisms, especially pathogenic bacteria (Odeyemi et al., 2020; Saha et al., 2024; Tapia et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2019). A cold chain system is the simplest way to control the freshness and microbiological safety of animal-derived foods. By applying this system, food quality is maintained by controlling the temperature at a low level during the entire process of harvesting fresh foods from the production site and then storing and transporting them to the final consumption site (Montanari, 2008; Ndraha et al., 2018). However, this approach is not perfect, as some microorganisms survive and multiply even at low temperatures. Low-temperature storage improves food storability; however, contamination with psychrotrophic bacteria may make this impossible (Chen et al., 2020).

Psychrotrophic bacteria, defined as cold-tolerant bacteria, have the ability to grow at temperatures below 7°C, such as those found in refrigerated conditions. These bacteria are known for causing spoilage in food products, especially animal-derived foods (Moyer et al., 2017; Tatini and Kauppi, 2002). Psychrotrophic bacteria can grow at low temperatures, although their growth is limited to a maximum temperature of approximately 20°C. Typically, these bacteria do not thrive over 35°C (Kanekar and Kanekar, 2022). Thus, they appear to be a subgroup of mesophiles, whose optimum growth range is between 30°C to 40°C. However, they are not a subgroup of psychrophiles, which prefer much colder environments, typically below 15°C (Cavicchioli, 2016). During storage at low temperatures, psychrotrophic bacteria that adapt to the low temperatures thrive better than mesophilic bacteria, leading to an increase in their cell population (Samaržija et al., 2012; Wickramasinghe et al., 2019). Moreover, compared to the mesophilic bacteria in raw milk, the quantity of psychrotrophic bacteria increased by over 10%. Psychrotrophic bacteria can produce enzymes related to heat resistance (e.g., proteolytic enzymes, lipolytic enzymes, and phospholipases), some of which have antibiotic resistance or the ability to produce toxins. Thus, psychrotrophic bacteria proliferate at low temperatures and not only spoil food but can also be difficult to inactivate through heat treatment (sterilization process) and can have adverse effects on human health.

Therefore, in this review, we aimed to determine the growth characteristics and species composition of psychrotrophic bacteria that are commonly observed in animal-derived foods and to check their contamination (distribution) status. In addition, we proposed a technique for reducing the number of psychrotrophic bacteria that can be applied to animal-derived food.

Characteristics of Psychrotrophic Bacteria

Psychrotrophic bacteria enter food from their mesophilic habitats and continue to grow at a slow pace in refrigerated environments. There are several reasons why psychrotrophic bacteria can continue to survive and grow even at low temperatures. First, they can maintain the activity of various enzymes involved in metabolism even under cold conditions. These bacteria possess enzymes that can be activated at low temperatures, and they provide thermolability and increase complementarity between the substrate and the active site, thereby providing high specific activity at low temperatures (Cavicchioli et al., 2002; Chattopadhyay, 2006; D’Amico et al., 2002). As a result, the activation energy is lowered, helping to maintain the substrate-enzyme reaction even at low temperatures (De Maayer et al., 2014). Second, they can maintain the membrane fluidity even at low temperatures due to their ability to regulate the composition of the cell membranes. The cell membrane transmits various signals and exchanges substances, especially nutrients. Therefore, cellular survival is highly dependent on the fluidity of the cell membrane (Moyer et al., 2017; Najjar et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2016). The membrane fluidity is determined by composition of the phospholipid bilayer comprising the cell membrane, which is odd-numbered, unsaturated, and anteiso fatty acids (Hagve, 1988; Yoon et al., 2015). Especially, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) had a low melting point, thus controlling the amount of PUFAs at low temperatures can be a good way to maintain membrane fluidity (Casanueva et al., 2010; Hassan et al., 2020). Moreover, a-C15:0, an anteiso fatty acid, plays a key role in bacterial survival at low temperatures; for example, a-C15:0 is a major component of bacteria living in the Antarctic region (Chattopadhyay and Jagannadham, 2003). In addition to changes in the composition of fatty acids in the cell membrane, changes in various transport proteins, which play a role in transporting substances into and out of the cytoplasm, also occur in the cell membrane. Psychrotrophic bacteria upregulate the expression of some of these proteins to ensure smooth transport of substances even at low temperatures (De Maayer et al., 2014). Third, they have or can uptake some substances that help them survive at low temperatures, such as antifreeze proteins (AFPs) and compatible solutes. AFPs, possess by psychrotrophic bacteria, which control the expression of proteins related to cold and heat shock, or by switching to a viable but nonculturable state (Chattopadhyay, 2006). They can prevent freezing or thawing damage to bacteria by inhibiting the growth of ice crystals at low temperatures (Celik et al., 2013). Psychrotrophic bacteria can respond to low temperatures by accumulating compatible solutes in the cytoplasm to increase the concentration of solutes and thereby increasing osmotic pressure (Casanueva et al., 2010). For example, glycine betaine, a type of compatible solute, is a substance that Listeria monocytogenes can synthesize, and its synthesis becomes active at low temperatures, which can stimulate the growth of L. monocytogenes at low temperatures (Beumer et al., 1994; Chan and Wiedmann, 2008; Zeisel et al., 2003). It should be remembered that all of the previously mentioned events are regulated by gene expression.

Psychrotrophic bacteria are the main cause of the spoilage of chilled and frozen foods derived from animals, including raw or cooked meat, dairy products, butter, fresh or cooked seafood, and vegetables (Wei et al., 2019). The most common psychrotrophic bacteria found in animal-derived food are Pseudomonas, Listeria, Yersinia, Serratia, Aerococcus, Acinetobacter, and Flavobacterium (Chen et al., 2020; Júnior et al., 2018; Yuan et al., 2017). Pseudomonas is the main bacterium that causes meat spoilage because it produces protein and fat hydrolases, biosurfactants, and colors (Rouger et al., 2018). Dhama et al. (2013) reported that meat and meat products, and dairy products are common sources of L. monocytogenes, an intracellular gram-positive bacterium that may survive and grow under refrigeration.

Contamination of Animal-Derived Foods due to Psychrotrophic Bacteria

Animal-derived foods often contaminated by psychrotrophic bacteria, including Listeria, Pseudomonas, and Yersinia. Numerous studies have reported cases of contamination in a variety of animal resources, including dairy products (milk and cheese), meat (poultry, pork, and beef), and animal-derived products (Table 1). Despite not being classified as a psychrotrophic bacterium, Clostridium has been commonly detected in animal-derived foods stored at low temperature.

Table 1. Summary of the studies reporting the prevalence of psychrotrophic bacteria in animal-derived foods
Microorganisms Type of foods No. of positive samples (%) Reference
Listeria spp. Dairy products Raw sheep milk 14/62 (22.6) Rahimi et al. (2010)
Raw cow milk 10/90 (11.1)
Raw goat milk 4/60 (6.7)
Cheese 17/90 (18.9)
Ice cream 7/68 (10.3)
Butter 2/40 (5.0)
Raw milk 41/140 (29.2) Akrami-Mohajeri et al. (2018)
Cheese 17/120 (14.2)
Butter 4/100 (4.0)
Raw milk 2/30 (6.7) Ismaiel et al. (2014)
Raw milk 84/766 (11.0) Al-Mariri et al. (2013)
Listeria monocytogenes Meat Pig carcass 12/430 (2.8) Oswaldi et al. (2021)
Raw pork 104/356 (29.2) Li et al. (2018)
Raw meat 98/525 (18.7) Kramarenko et al. (2013)
Frozen lean beef 1/30 (3.3) Ismaiel et al. (2014)
Raw meats (minced pork and beef meat) 103/295 (34.9) Vitas and Garcia-Jalon (2004)
Poultry 57/158 (36.1)
Raw processed meat 149/765 (19.5) Matle et al. (2019)
Raw intact meat 56/557 (10.1)
Dairy products White cheese 5/105 (4.8) Kahraman et al. (2010)
Processed cheese 1/70 (1.4)
Queso fresco cheese 7/75 (9.3) Beltran et al. (2015)
Adobera cheese 12/100 (12.0) Torres-Vitela et al. (2012)
Panela cheese 6/100 (6.0)
Ready-to-eat (RTE) meat products Ham and turkey 6/507 (1.2) Lambertz et al. (2012)
RTE milk products 13/4,901 (0.3) Kramarenko et al. (2013)
RTE meat products 135/6,746 (2.0)
RTE meat products 59/436 (13.5) Matle et al. (2019)
Pseudomonas spp. Dairy products Raw milk 93/103 (90.3) Marchand et al. (2012)
Raw milk 35/50 (70.0) Aziz et al. (2022)
Milk (raw, n=4; pasteurized, n=8) 6/12 (50.0) Carminati et al. (2019)
Cheese 3/20 (15.0)
White cheese 32/140 (22.9) Arslan et al. (2011)
Meat Chicken meat 7/15 (46.7) Mahato et al. (2020)
Chicken meat 91/168 (54.2) Wu et al. (2023)
Pork meat 18/91 (19.8)
Frozen chicken meat 69/320 (21.6) Elbehiry et al. (2022)
Fresh beef 3/60 (5.0) Rezaloo et al. (2022)
Frozen beef 8/60 (13.3)
Beef 122/230 (53.0) Benie et al. (2017)
Smoked fish 33/140 (23.6)
Fresh fish 49/140 (35.0)
RTE meat product Sausage 5/60 (8.3) Sofy et al. (2017)
Luncheon meat 11/60 (18.3)
Beef burger 1/60 (1.7)
Frozen burger 1/25 (4.0) Hassan et al. (2020)
Animal Fecal samples 46/704 (6.5) Ruiz-Roldán et al. (2020)
Yersinia enterocolitica Dairy products Dairy products (cheese, butter, and yogurt) 6/49 (12.2) Mancini et al. (2022)
Raw cow milk 12/44 (27.3)
Raw goat milk 1/4 (25.0)
Raw milk 19/446 (4.3) Jamali et al. (2015)
Raw milk 11/50 (22.0) Ahmed et al. (2019)
Fermented milk 6/50 (12.0)
Pasteurized milk 2/50 (4.0)
Ripened salted cheese 1/50 (2.0)
Meat Chicken 132/720 (18.3) Momtaz et al. (2013)
Chicken 37/50 (74.0) Palau et al. (2024)
Pork 8/10 (80.0)
Pork 11/237 (4.6) Esnault et al. (2013)
Beef 11/210 (5.2)
Poultry 12/202 (5.9)
Chicken 41/190 (21.6) Soltan Dallal et al. (2010)
Beef 19/189 (10.1)
Clostridium botulinum Honey Polish honey 5/240 (2.1) Grenda et al. (2018)
Kazakh honey 1/197 (0.5) Maikanov et al. (2019)
Clostridium perfringens Honey Kazakh honey 18/197 (9.1) Maikanov et al. (2019)
Dairy products Raw milk 78/79 (98.7) Feligini et al. (2014)
Curd 79/79 (100.0)
Meat and meat products Beef 20/40 (50.0) Issimov et al. (2022)
Lamb 9/40 (22.5)
Ground beef 11/40 (27.5)
Minced lamb 16/40 (40.0)
Raw chicken 6/25 (24.0) Shaltout et al. (2017)
Raw beef 4/25 (16.0)
Download Excel Table
Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria spp. have been identified in various animal-derived food sources across different regions, highlighting their prevalence in the food chain and their potential risks to public health. Particularly concerning for animal-derived food safety is the fact that L. monocytogenes can grow at refrigerated conditions. Raw milk and cheese (Akrami-Mohajeri et al., 2018; Costanzo et al., 2020; Rahimi et al., 2010), meats (Li et al., 2018; Oswaldi et al., 2021), and ready-to-eat (RTE) meat products (Calvo-Arrieta et al., 2021; Meza-Bone et al., 2023) are the most common animal-derived foods contaminated with L. monocytogenes. In Syria, research has shown that 11.0% of raw milk samples tested positive for Listeria spp. (Al-Mariri et al., 2013). In Egypt, Listeria spp. were found in cheese and raw milk at rates ranging from 3.3% to 6.7% (Ismaiel et al., 2014). In Turkey, Kahraman et al. (2010) found that 4.8% of L. monocytogenes were detected in white cheese samples, whereas processed cheese samples had a detection rate of 1.4%. In Mexico, L. monocytogenes was detected in 9.3% of queso fresco, 12.0% of adobera, and 6.0% of panela cheese, all of which are type of fresh cheese (Beltran et al., 2015; Torres-Vitela et al., 2012). In South Africa, L. monocytogenes was detected in a range of meat and meat products obtained from cattle, pork, sheep, game meat, and poultry (Matle et al., 2019). In this study, L. monocytogenes were found in 10.1% of uncooked whole meat, 13.5% of RTE meat products, and 19.5% of uncooked processed meat. In Spain, Vitas and Garcia-Jalon (2004) analyzed 396 meat product samples obtained from 55 small meat-processing plants, and L. monocytogenes were detected in 36.1% of poultry meat, 34.9% of minced pork and beef. In Quevedo, a city in Ecuador, 16.3% of L. monocytogenes was present in RTE meat products, including grilled hamburger meat, mortadella, and salami. The concentration of L. monocytogenes ranged from 4 to 6 Log CFU/g, or possibly much higher (Meza-Bone et al., 2023).

Pseudomonas spp.

Pseudomonas is a prevalent member of the microbiota in various animal-derived foods, including pork (Bruckner et al., 2012), chicken (Elbehiry et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2023), beef (Ercolini et al., 2009), and milk (Aziz et al., 2022). Wu et al. (2023) identified 109 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, which constituted 42.1% of 259 samples collected across six districts in Beijing, China. Especially, 91 isolates from chicken samples (54.2%) and 18 from pork samples (19.8%). Similarly, Mahato et al. (2020) described that P. aeruginosa was detected in 46.7% of chicken meat samples. Among the 370 meat and meat product samples analyzed by Rezaloo et al. (2022), 29 samples were contaminated with P. aeruginosa. Notably, imported frozen beef harbored the highest prevalence (20.0%), followed by frozen beef (13.3%) and fresh beef samples (5.0%). Benie et al. (2017) reported that the prevalence of P. aeruginosa among smoked fish, fresh fish, and beef samples was 23.6%, 35.0%, and 53.0%, respectively. Furthermore, P. aeruginosa prevalence among sausage, luncheon meat, beef burger, and frozen burger samples was 8.3%, 18.3%, 1.7%, and 4.0%, respectively (Sheir et al., 2020; Sofy et al., 2017). In the dairy foods, P. aeruginosa was detected in 70.0% of milk samples and 24.0% of samples collected from a milk tank at a dairy cattle farm in Egypt (Aziz et al., 2022). Carminati et al. (2019) found that Pseudomonas spp. was isolated from 50.0% of milk and 15.0% of cheese samples, with concentrations between 3.45 and 4.05 Log CFU/mL or g. Similarly, Arslan et al. (2011) reported that 22.9% of Pseudomonas spp. was isolated from 140 homemade white cheese samples, with the dominant isolate being Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes (15.0%), followed by Pseudomonas alcaligenes (5.0%), P. aeruginosa (1.4%), and P. fluorescens biovar V (0.7%). Furthermore, certain Pseudomonas species, including potentially pathogenic ones like Pseudomonas fulva, P. aeruginosa, and Pseudomonas putida have been found in the fecal samples of healthy animals. A study analyzing 704 animal fecal samples identified 133 isolates of Pseudomonas spp. belonging to 23 different species, recovered from 46 samples (6.5%; Ruiz-Roldán et al., 2020).

Yersinia enterocolitica

Yersinia, particularly Y. enterocolitica, has been isolated and found to contaminate various types of animal-derived foods, such as raw and undercooked pork meats, milk, and dairy products (Ali et al., 2021). Yersinia presence in animal-derived foods poses significant public health risks as it can cause yersiniosis, which can range from mild self-limiting gastroenteritis to more severe illnesses, including septicemia and yersiniosis (Hordofa, 2021). Swine serves as the main reservoir for Y. enterocolitica, with pathogenic strains found in swine and pork products are most commonly reported in human illnesses (MacDonald et al., 2012). Further food-producing animals that have been linked to Y. enterocolitica include sheep, poultry, and cattle. Palau et al. (2024) isolated Y. enterocolitica from 53 of 70 samples (75.7%), including 37 from 50 chicken (74.0%), 8 from 10 pork (80.0%), and 8 from 10 salmon (80.0%). In France, Y. enterocolitica was found in 5.9% of chicken and 4.6% of pork samples (Esnault et al., 2013). Furthermore, Soltan Dallal et al. (2010) recovered Yersinia spp. from 16% of 379 samples, with 21.6% from chicken and 10.1% from beef. In the dairy foods, Y. enterocolitica was detected in 12.2% of dairy products made from raw milk, 27.3% of raw cow milk, and 25.0% of raw goat milk collected from Apulia and Basilicata regions in Southern Italy (Mancini et al., 2022). Ahmed et al. (2019) reported that Y. enterocolitica was isolated from raw milk and dairy products in 40% of examined samples. Notably, the highest isolation rate was 22.0% from raw milk, followed by 12.0%, 4.0%, and 2.0% from fermented milk, pasteurized milk, and ripened salted cheese, respectively. Additionally, in Iran, Y. enterocolitica was isolated from 4.3% of bulk raw milk samples including cow, sheep, and goat milk (Jamali et al., 2015).

Clostridium spp.

Clostridium spp. is generally not considered psychrotrophic bacteria, however, it is notable for their ability to produce endospores that can endure diverse environmental conditions, including cold temperatures. Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium perfringens are recognized for their potential to induce foodborne illnesses through toxins or spores (Grenda et al., 2017). Additionally, C. botulinum can be found in honey as dormant spores. The low water activity and pH (acidic) of honey, which generally inhibit the growth of many bacteria, did not affect C. botulinum spores. Grenda et al. (2018) reported a 2.1% prevalence of C. botulinum in honey samples in Poland. Additionally, Maikanov et al. (2019) found that C. botulinum was isolated in only 0.5% of the samples, and C. perfringens was isolated from 18 of the 197 honey samples (9.1%). One incidence of newborn botulism was reported in the United Kingdom in 2001, and it seemed that the cause was powdered infant formula contaminated with C. botulinum spores (Brett et al., 2005). According to Barash et al. (2010), 78.0% of the powdered infant formula samples contained clostridial spores, specifically Clostridium sporogenes. The isolation of clostridial spores indicates that neurotoxic clostridial spores may be found in these products. In Italy, clostridial spores were detected in 99.0% of the 527 analyzed sheep milk samples. Among these samples, 86% had spore concentrations higher than the 1,000 spores/L (Turchi et al., 2016). Furthermore, C. perfringens was found in 98.7% of raw milk in tanks and 100.0% of curd samples used for Grana Padano cheese production in Northern Italy (Feligini et al., 2014). In meat and meat products, C. perfringens was detected in 50.0% of beef, 22.5% of lamb, 27.5% of ground beef, and 40.0% of minced lamb by Issimov et al. (2022). Shaltout et al. (2017) reported that C. perfringens was detected in 15.0% of beef and chicken before and after cooking, represented by 24.0% of raw chicken, 12.0% of cooked chicken, 16.0% of raw beef, and 8.0% of cooked beef samples.

Reduction of Psychrotrophic Bacteria in Animal-Derived Foods

Thermal technologies have been used to deactivate microorganisms present in animal-derived food products. However, these techniques have a negative effect on the nutritional and sensory values of the treated food products (Jauhar et al., 2020). Conventional decontamination technologies for meat and meat products include heat processing, chilled storage, vacuum packing, and chemical preservation. However, the use of heat during processing might reduce the nutritional value and sensory characteristics, while chemically treated products might show significant residue deposition (Jadhav et al., 2021). To eliminate pathogenic bacteria from animal-derived foods without heating and affecting the quality of the food, nonthermal techniques have been presented as alternatives to conventional pasteurization (Lee and Yoon, 2024). The various specific nonthermal techniques are described below.

Use of gas

Each microorganism has its own unique oxygen requirement, and therefore, the growth of microorganisms can be controlled by changing the air composition. One method of adjusting the composition of air is the modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). This method particularly focuses on aerobic microorganisms because it replaces oxygen in the air with carbon dioxide or nitrogen (Farber et al., 2003; Kader, 1986). It not only inhibits the growth of aerobic microorganisms, but also prevents rancidity of fat caused by oxygen, thus it can be effectively applied to meat products containing fat. As an example, Y. enterocolitica and L. monocytogenes might survive in MAP foods between 0°C to 1°C (Barakat and Harris, 1999; Hudson et al., 1994). When pure nitrogen gas was injected into raw milk, the Pseudomonas growth was significantly limited, and when carbon dioxide was added to raw milk, the microbiological quality was maintained for a long period of time, making it possible to produce milk with a long shelf life (Munsch-Alatossava et al., 2010; Vianna et al., 2012; Yuan et al., 2019). In contrast, Huang et al. (2020) reported higher concentrations of Pseudomonas in roasted chicken stored under MAP (40% CO2/60% N2) conditions. Also, it has limitations in that spoilage caused by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is occasionally observed. LAB lowers pH and causes muscle tissue destruction and moisture lose in meat stored under high CO2 level (Wang et al., 2017; Wickramasinghe et al., 2019).

Additionally, supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) can be used to control pathogenic bacteria in animal-derived foods. SC-CO2 diffuses CO2 to lower cytoplasmic pH and extracts important components to change microbial cell membranes (Guerrero et al., 2017). It is currently not known how SC-CO2 exhibits bactericidal activity, potentially, might depend on variables including pressure, temperature, and exposure time. According to the previous studies, SC-CO2 might enhance membrane fluidity and permeability, as well as its ability to extract membrane components such as phospholipids (Budisa and Schulze-Makuch, 2014; Jauhar et al., 2020). Wei et al. (1991) initially investigated the inactivation of L. monocytogenes and Salmonella in spiked chicken meat using SC-CO2 treatment, and 1–2 Log CFU/g of L. monocytogenes and Salmonella were reduced at 13.7 MPa and 35°C for 2 h. Furthermore, Ferrentino et al. (2013) reported that the growth of L. monocytogenes in dry-cured ham was reduced by 3 Log CFU/g at 45°C and 12 MPa for 5 min, and by 7 Log CFU/g at 50°C and 12 MPa for 15 min.

The application of cold plasma treatment has generated significant attention as a low-energy, non-thermal, and eco-friendly technique (Koddy et al., 2021). Previous studies have shown that the application of cold plasma can extend the storage duration of food products by inactivating bacteria and enzymes, while maintaining the overall quality of the food (Koddy et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). The cell membrane and enzymes are predominantly damaged by reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) during cold plasma treatment (Kang et al., 2021; Liao et al., 2017). Kim et al. (2011) reported a decrease of about 1–2 Log CFU/g for L. monocytogenes, Esherichia coli, and Salmonella on sliced bacon when treated with He and He/O2 plasmas. Ulbin-Figlewicz and Jarmoluk (2014) found a notable reduction of 2 Log CFU/g for Y. enterocolitica within 2 min and 2 Log CFU/g for P. fluorescens after 5 and 10 min of exposure to cold plasma for beef.

Lytic bacteriophages

Bacteriophage (Phage) refers to a virus that uses bacteria as a host, and when infected with a specific bacterium, it has a life cycle of self-proliferating within the bacterium and lysis the bacterium (Cooper, 2016). Phages are increasingly being applied as a biological control method to improve the microbiological safety in the food industry. Currently, phages targeting bacteria such as L. monocytogenes are being sold with approval from the Food and Drug Administration (Moye et al., 2018). LISTEX P100 phage is one of the phages that fight against L. monocytogenes, and effectively reduced L. monocytogenes (2.5 Log units reduction) that had been artificially contaminated in Brazilian fresh sausages (Rossi et al., 2011). Commercial phages based on LISTEX P100 are safe enough to be registered as GRAS (Sillankorva et al., 2012). Mohammadi et al. (2022) examined phages effect of C. perfringens lysis, and phages induced survival of C. perfringens in pasteurized milk and chicken meat. The effect of phages to lyse bacteria becomes stronger when bacteria are metabolically active, so the effect is better at room temperature or 37°C rather than at low temperatures (Cooper, 2016; Tomat et al., 2018). Since decreased metabolism of bacteria means decreased metabolism of phages, the latency period of phages may be somewhat longer at low temperatures. Nevertheless, since the bacterial lytic ability of phages is clearly observed even at low temperatures (Cooper, 2016), it may be effective in controlling the growth of psychrotrophic bacteria.

High pressure processing

High-pressure processing (HPP) is a non-thermal technique that changes protein structure, causes protein denaturation, and lowers enzyme activity in microorganisms in order to prevent the growth of pathogenic psychrotrophic bacteria (Hurtado et al., 2019; Wiśniewski et al., 2024). HPP increases the duration that various foods, including seafood, dairy products, meat products (RTE sliced deli meat, dry-cured meat, and hotdog products), and liquid products (fruit juices and purees), may be stored without spoiling. The storage duration of products preserved with this technology is a few days to a few weeks, and they should be kept at a temperature below 7°C (Silva and Evelyn, 2023). Park et al. (2022) reported a significant reduction in L. monocytogenes in raw beef when treated with HPP for 2 to 7 min at 500 MPa and 4°C, decreasing from 3.9 to 6.5 Log CFU/g. In contrast, Stratakos et al. (2019) reported that extending the duration of HPP treatment from 3 to 5 min at pressure of 400, 500, and 600 MPa at 18°C in raw milk only slightly increased L. monocytogenes decline from 5.7 to 5.9 Log CFU/g. However, HPP has several limitations, including difficulties in commercialization due to high installation and maintenance costs (Aganovic et al., 2017). Furthermore, HPP is ineffective against spores and certain enzymes that are resistant to pressure, and it may induce color changes in some animal foods (Bolumar et al., 2020; Myers et al., 2013).

Ohmic heating

Ohmic heating is an innovative technique for heating food substances promptly, uniformly, and efficiently and is effective at inactivating microorganisms (Richa et al., 2017). The importance of the relationship between metallic prosthetic groups (polyphenol oxidase, lipoxygenases, and alkaline phosphatase) and electric current was emphasized by Makroo et al. (2020). Ohmic heating, depending on variables such as electrical conductivity, time, and electric field strength, effectively eliminates pathogens (L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and Salmonella) and spoilers (Leuconostoc mesenteroides and P. aeruginosa) in animal-derived foods (Lee et al., 2012; Saxena et al., 2016). Salmonella in baby formula and Streptococcus thermophilus in milk were reduced by about 5 Log CFU/mL at 60°C in 2.91 min and 15 min, respectively, using ohmic heating, which demonstrated a more intense inactivation rate than conventional heating (Pires et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2008). Furthermore, ohmic heating reduced P. aeruginosa in meatball samples by 3 Log CFU/g at 125°C for 5 min (Mitelut et al., 2011).

Ultraviolet light

Ultraviolet (UV) light, with wavelengths ranging from 100 to 400 nm (Barba et al., 2017), has been used to increase the storage duration of various animal-derived foods by bactericidal inactivation and enzyme inhibition (Manzocco et al., 2009; Monteiro et al., 2020; Visuthiwan and Assatarakul, 2021). UV light can deactivate microbial enzymes through: (1) UV radiation is absorbed by chromophore groups or proteins, which produces excited states or radicals, and (2) proteins can be indirectly oxidized by singlet oxygen, which is formed from other chemicals that absorb light energy. These actions can cause oxidative stress, leading to alterations in the three-dimensional conformation of proteins and a decrease in their catalytic activity (Lante et al., 2013). UV-C light decreased the counts of L. monocytogenes, Pseudomonas spp., and β-lactamase producing bacteria from 1.1 to 2.8 Log CFU/cm2 at 0.05 to 3 J/cm2 (10 mW/cm2, from 5 to 300 s; McLeod et al., 2018). Additionally, Brochothrix thermosphacta and Y. enterocolitica counts were decreased by up to 1.1 Log CFU/g and 0.8 Log CFU/g, respectively, by UV-C light during refrigerated storage at concentrations of 408 and 4,080 mJ/cm2 (Reichel et al., 2020).

Conclusion

Psychrotrophic bacteria present a significant challenge in maintaining the safety and quality of animal-derived foods during storage and transportation, particularly under refrigerated conditions. Understanding the characteristics and prevalence of these bacteria as well as their contamination patterns in various animal resources is crucial for implementing effective control measures. Nonthermal techniques offer promising alternatives to traditional thermal techniques for reducing psychrotrophic bacterial contamination in animal-derived foods while preserving their sensory and nutritional properties. Further research and implementation of these technologies are essential to ensure the microbiological safety and storage duration of animal-derived products in the food industry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Lee J. Data curation: Oh H. Writing - original draft: Oh H, Lee J. Writing - review & editing: Oh H, Lee J.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Aganovic K, Smetana S, Grauwet T, Toepfl S, Mathys A, Van Loey A, Heinz V. 2017; Pilot scale thermal and alternative pasteurization of tomato and watermelon juice: An energy comparison and life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod. 141:514-525

2.

Ahmed HA, Tahoun ABMB, Elez RMMA, Abd El-Hamid MI, Abd Ellatif SS. 2019; Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in milk and dairy products and the effects of storage temperatures on survival and virulence gene expression. Int Dairy J. 94:16-21

3.

Akrami-Mohajeri F, Derakhshan Z, Ferrante M, Hamidiyan N, Soleymani M, Oliveri Conti G, Dehghani Tafti R. 2018; The prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Listeria spp in raw milk and traditional dairy products delivered in Yazd, central Iran. Food Chem Toxicol. 114:141-144

4.

Ali S, Aslam R, Arshad MI, Mahmood MS, Nawaz Z. 2021; Meat borne bacterial pathogens. In Section B: Bacterial diseases. Veterinary pathobiology and public health. In: Abbas RZ, Khan A, editors.(ed)Unique Scientific. Faisalabad, Pakistan: pp p. 216-228

5.

Al-Mariri A, Younes A, Ramadan L. 2013; Prevalence of Listeria spp. in raw milk in Syria. Bulg J Vet Med. 16:112-122.

6.

Arslan S, Eyi A, Özdemir F. 2011; Spoilage potentials and antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas spp. isolated from cheeses. J Dairy Sci. 94:5851-5856

7.

Aziz SAAA, Mahmoud R, Mohamed MBED. 2022; Control of biofilm-producing Pseudomonasaeruginosa isolated from dairy farm using virokill silver nano-based disinfectant as an alternative approach. Sci Rep. 12:9452

8.

Barakat RK, Harris LJ. 1999; Growth of Listeria monocytogenes and Yersinia enterocolitica on cooked modified-atmosphere-packaged poultry in the presence and absence of a naturally occurring microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 65:342-345

9.

Barash JR, Hsia JK, Arnon SS. 2010; Presence of soil-dwelling clostridia in commercial powdered infant formulas. J Pedatr. 156:402-408

10.

Barba FJ, Koubaa M, do Prado-Silva L, Orlien V, Sant’ana AS. 2017; Mild processing applied to the inactivation of the main foodborne bacterial pathogens: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 66:20-35

11.

Beltran MS, Gerba CP, Fett AP, Luchansky JB, Chaidez C. 2015; Prevalence and characterization of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from small Mexican retail markets of queso fresco. Int J Environ Health Res. 25:140-148

12.

Benie CKD, Nathalie G, Adjéhi D, Solange A, Fernique konan K, Desire K, Bourahima B, Marcellin DK, Mireille D. 2017; Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from bovine meat, fresh fish and smoked fish. Arch Clin Microbiol. 8:40.

13.

Beumer RR, Te Giffel MC, Cox LJ, Rombouts FM, Abee T. 1994; Effect of exogenous proline, betaine, and carnitine on growth of Listeria monocytogenes in a minimal medium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 60:1359-1363

14.

Bolumar T, Orlien V, Sikes A, Aganovic K, Bak KH, Guyon C, Stubler AS, de Lamballerie M, Hertel C, Bruggemann DA. 2020; High-pressure processing of meat: Molecular impacts and industrial applications. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 20:332-368

15.

Brett MM, McLauchlin J, Harris A, O’Brien S, Black N, Forsyth RJ, Roberts D, Bolton FJ. 2005; A case of infant botulism with a possible link to infant formula milk powder: Evidence for the presence of more than one strain of Clostridium botulinum in clinical specimens and food. J Med Microbiol. 54:769-776

16.

Bruckner S, Albrecht A, Petersen B, Kreyenschmidt J. 2012; Characterization and comparison of spoilage processes in fresh pork and poultry. J Food Qual. 35:372-382

17.

Budisa N, Schulze-Makuch D. 2014; Supercritical carbon dioxide and its potential as a life-sustaining solvent in a planetary environment. Life. 4:331-340

18.

Calvo-Arrieta K, Matamoros-Montoya K, Arias-Echandi ML, Huete-Soto A, Redondo-Solano M. 2021; Presence of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meat products sold at retail stores in Costa Rica and analysis of contributing factors. J Food Prot. 84:1729-1740

19.

Carminati D, Bonvini B, Rossetti L, Zago M, Tidona F, Giraffa G. 2019; Investigation on the presence of blue pigment-producing Pseudomonas strains along a production line of fresh mozzarella cheese. Food Control. 100:321-328

20.

Casanueva A, Tuffin M, Cary C, Cowan DA. 2010; Molecular adaptations to psychrophily: The impact of ‘omic’ technologies. Trends Microbiol. 18:374-381

21.

Cavicchioli R. 2016; On the concept of a psychrophile. ISME J. 10:793-795

22.

Cavicchioli R, Siddiqui KS, Andrews D, Sowers KR. 2002; Low-temperature extremophiles and their applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 13:253-261

23.

Celik Y, Drori R, Pertaya-Braun N, Altan A, Barton T, Bar-Dolev M, Groisman A, Davies PL, Braslavsky I. 2013; Microfluidic experiments reveal that antifreeze proteins bound to ice crystals suffice to prevent their growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:1309-1314

24.

Chan YC, Wiedmann M. 2008; Physiology and genetics of Listeria monocytogenes survival and growth at cold temperatures. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 49:237-253

25.

Chattopadhyay MK. 2006; Mechanism of bacterial adaptation to low temperature. J Biosci. 31:157-165

26.

Chattopadhyay MK, Jagannadham MV. 2003; A branched chain fatty acid promotes cold adaptation in bacteria. J Biosci. 28:363-364

27.

Chen J, Kawamura S, Koseki S. 2020; Effect of d-tryptophan on the psychrotrophic growth of Listeria monocytogenes and its application in milk. Food Control. 110:107048

28.

Cooper IR. 2016; A review of current methods using bacteriophages in live animals, food and animal products intended for human consumption. J Microbiol Methods. 130:38-47

29.

Costanzo N, Ceniti C, Santoro A, Clausi MT, Casalinuovo F. 2020; Foodborne pathogen assessment in raw milk cheeses. Int J Food Sci. 2020:3616713

30.

D’Amico S, Claverie P, Collins T, Georlette D, Gratia E, Hoyoux A, Meuwis MA, Feller G, Gerday C. 2002; Molecular basis of cold adaptation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 357:917-925

31.

De Maayer P, Anderson D, Cary C, Cowan DA. 2014; Some like it cold: Understanding the survival strategies of psychrophiles. EMBO Rep. 15:508-517

32.

Dhama K, Rajagunalan S, Chakraborty S, Verma AK, Kumar A, Tiwari R, Kapoor S. 2013; Food-borne pathogens of animal origin-diagnosis, prevention, control and their zoonotic significance: A review. Pak J Biol Sci. 16:1076-1085

33.

Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Aldubaib M, Moussa I, Abalkhail A, Ibrahem M, Hamada M, Sindi W, Alzaben F, Almuzaini AM, Algammal AM, Rawway M. 2022; Pseudomonas species prevalence, protein analysis, and antibiotic resistance: An evolving public health challenge. AMB Express. 12:53

34.

Ercolini D, Russo F, Nasi A, Ferranti P, Villani F. 2009; Mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria from meat and their spoilage potential in vitro and in beef. Appl Environ Microbiol. 75:1990-2001

35.

Esnault E, Labbé A, Houdayer C, Denis M. 2013; Yersinia enterocolitica prevalence, on fresh pork, poultry and beef meat at retail level, in France. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Epidemiology and Control of Biological. Chemical and Physical Hazards in Pigs and Pork. Edinburgh, UK: pp p. 72-75

36.

Farber JN, Harris LJ, Parish ME, Beuchat LR, Suslow TV, Gorney JR, Garrett EH, Busta FF. 2003; Microbiological safety of controlled and modified atmosphere packaging of fresh and fresh-cut produce. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2:142-160

37.

Feligini M, Brambati E, Panelli S, Ghitti M, Sacchi R, Capelli E, Bonacina C. 2014; One-year investigation of Clostridium spp. occurrence in raw milk and curd of Grana Padano cheese by the automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. Food Control. 42:71-77

38.

Ferrentino G, Balzan S, Spilimbergo S. 2013; Supercritical carbon dioxide processing of dry cured ham spiked with Listeria monocytogenes: Inactivation kinetics, color, and sensory evaluations. Food Bioprocess Technol. 6:1164-1174

39.

Grenda T, Grabczak M, Kwiatek K, Bober A. 2017; Prevalence of C. botulinum and C. perfringens spores in food products available on Polish market. J Vet Res. 61:287-291

40.

Grenda T, Grabczak M, Sieradzki Z, Kwiatek K, Pohorecka K, Skubida M, Bober A. 2018; Clostridium botulinum spores in Polish honey samples. J Vet Sci. 19:635-642

41.

Guerrero SN, Ferrario M, Schenk M, Carrillo MG. 2017; Hurdle technology using ultrasound for food preservation. In Ultrasound: Advances for food processing and preservation. In: Bermudez-Aguirre D, editor.(ed)Academic Press. Cambridge, MA, USA: pp p. 39-99

42.

Hagve TA. 1988; Effects of unsaturated fatty acids on cell membrane functions. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 48:381-388

43.

Hassan N, Anesio AM, Rafiq M, Holtvoeth J, Bull I, Haleem A, Shah AA, Hasan F. 2020; Temperature driven membrane lipid adaptation in glacial psychrophilic bacteria. Front Microbiol. 11:824

44.

Hordofa DL. 2021; Review on yersiniosis and its public health importance. Int J Vet Sci Anim Husb. 6:37-41

45.

Huang J, Guo Y, Hou Q, Huang M, Zhou X. 2020; Dynamic changes of the bacterial communities in roast chicken stored under normal and modified atmosphere packaging. J Food Sci. 85:1231-1239

46.

Hudson JA, Mott SJ, Penney N. 1994; Growth of Listeria monocytogenes, Aeromonas hydrophila, and Yersinia enterocolitica on vacuum and saturated carbon dioxide controlled atmosphere-packaged sliced roast beef. J Food Prot. 57:204-208

47.

Hurtado A, Dolors Guàrdia M, Picouet P, Jofré A, Bañón S, María Ros J. 2019; Shelf-life extension of multi-vegetables smoothies by high-pressure processing compared with thermal treatment. Part I: Microbial and enzyme inhibition, antioxidant status, and physical stability. J Food Process Preserv. 43e14139

48.

Ismaiel AAR, Ali AES, Enan G. 2014; Incidence of Listeria in Egyptian meat and dairy samples. Food Sci Biotechnol. 23:179-185

49.

Issimov A, Baibatyrov T, Tayeva A, Kenenbay S, Abzhanova S, Shambulova G, Kuzembayeva G, Kozhakhiyeva M, Brel-Kisseleva I, Safronova O, Bauzhanova L, Yeszhanova G, Bukarbayev K, Katasheva A, Uzal FA. 2022; Prevalence of Clostridium perfringens and detection of its toxins in meat products in selected areas of West Kazakhstan. Agriculture. 12:1357

50.

Jadhav HB, Annapure US, Deshmukh RR. 2021; Non-thermal technologies for food processing. Front Nutr. 8:657090

51.

Jamali H, Paydar M, Radmehr B, Ismail S. 2015; Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial resistance of Yersinia species and Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from raw milk in farm bulk tanks. J Dairy Sci. 98:798-803

52.

Jauhar S, Ismail-Fitry MR, Chong GH, Nor-Khaizura MAR, Ibadullah WZW. 2020; Different pressures, low temperature, and short-duration supercritical carbon dioxide treatments: Microbiological, physicochemical, microstructural, and sensorial attributes of chill-stored chicken. Appl Sci. 10:6629

53.

Júnior JCR, de Oliveira AM, de G Silva F, Tamanini R, de Oliveira ALM, Beloti V. 2018; The main spoilage-related psychrotrophic bacteria in refrigerated raw milk. J Dairy Sci. 101:75-83

54.

Kader AA. 1986; Biochemical and physiological basis for effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on fruits and vegetables. Food Technol. 40:99-104.

55.

Kahraman T, Ozmen G, Ozinan B, Omer Goksoy E. 2010; Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in different cheese types produced in Turkey. Br Food J. 112:1230-1236

56.

Kanekar PP, Kanekar SP. 2022; Psychrophilic, psychrotrophic, and psychrotolerant microorganisms. In Diversity and biotechnology of extremophilic microorganisms from India. Microorganisms for sustainability. In: Kanekar PP, Kanekar SP, editors.(ed)Springer. Singapore: pp p. 215-249

57.

Kang JH, Bai J, Min SC. 2021; Inactivation of indigenous microorganisms and Salmonella in Korean rice cakes by in-package cold plasma treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18:3360

58.

Kim B, Yun H, Jung S, Jung Y, Jung H, Choe W, Jo C. 2011; Effect of atmospheric pressure plasma on inactivation of pathogens inoculated onto bacon using two different gas compositions. Food Microbiol. 28:9-13

59.

Koddy JK, Miao W, Hatab S, Tang L, Xu H, Nyaisaba BM, Chen M, Deng S. 2021; Understanding the role of atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) in maintaining the quality of hairtail (Trichiurus lepturus). Food Chem. 343:128418

60.

Kramarenko T, Roasto M, Meremae K, Kuningas M, Poltsama P, Elias T. 2013; Listeria monocytogenes prevalence and serotype diversity in various foods. Food Control. 30:24-29

61.

Lambertz ST, Nilsson C, Bradenmark A, Sylven S, Johansson A, Jansson LM, Lindblad M. 2012; Prevalence and level of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods in Sweden 2010. Int J Food Microbiol. 160:24-31

62.

Lante A, Tinello F, Lomolino G. 2013; Effect of UV light on microbial proteases: From enzyme inactivation to antioxidant mitigation. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 17:130-134

63.

Lee SY, Sagong HG, Ryu S, Kang DH. 2012; Effect of continuous ohmic heating to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in orange juice and tomato juice. J Appl Microbiol. 112:723-731

64.

Lee Y, Yoon Y. 2024; Principles and applications of non-thermal technologies for meat decontamination. Food Sci Anim Resour. 44:19-38

65.

Li H, Wang P, Lan R, Luo L, Cao X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li H, Zhang L, Ji S, Ye C. 2018; Risk factors and level of Listeria monocytogenes contamination of raw pork in retail markets in China. Front Microbiol. 9:1090

66.

Liao X, Liu D, Xiang Q, Ahn J, Chen S, Ye X, Ding T. 2017; Inactivation mechanisms of non-thermal plasma on microbes: A review. Food Control. 75:83-91

67.

MacDonald E, Heier BT, Nygård K, Stalheim T, Cudjoe KS, Skjerdal T, Wester AL, Lindstedt BA, Stavnes TL, Vold L. 2012; Yersinia enterocolitica outbreak associated with ready-to-eat salad mix, Norway, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 18:1496-1499

68.

Mahato A, Mahato S, Dhakal K, Dhakal A. 2020; Investigating the diversity of spoilage and food intoxicating bacteria from chicken meat of Biratnagar, Nepal. J Bacteriol Mycol. 7:1141.

69.

Maikanov B, Mustafina R, Auteleyeva L, Wiśniewski J, Anusz K, Grenda T, Kwiatek K, Goldsztejn M, Grabczak M. 2019; Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium perfringens occurrence in Kazakh honey samples. Toxins. 11:472

70.

Makroo HA, Rastogi NK, Srivastava B. 2020; Ohmic heating assisted inactivation of enzymes and microorganisms in foods: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 97:451-465

71.

Mancini ME, Beverelli M, Donatiello A, Didonna A, Dattoli L, Faleo S, Occhiochiuso G, Galante D, Rondinone V, Del Sambro L, Bianco A, Miccolupo A, Goffredo E. 2022; Isolation and characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica from foods in Apulia and Basilicata regions (Italy) by conventional and modern methods. PLOS ONE. 17e0268706

72.

Manzocco L, Quarta B, Dri A. 2009; Polyphenoloxidase inactivation by light exposure in model systems and apple derivatives. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 10:506-511

73.

Marchand S, De Block J, De Jonghe V, Coorevits A, Heyndrickx M, Herman L. 2012; Biofilm formation in milk production and processing environments: Influence on milk quality and safety. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 11:133-147

74.

Matle I, Mbatha KR, Lentsoane O, Magwedere K, Morey L, Madoroba E. 2019; Occurrence, serotypes, and characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes in meat and meat products in South Africa between 2014 and 2016. J Food Saf. 39e12629

75.

McLeod A, Liland KH, Haugen JE, Sørheim O, Myhrer KS, Holck AL. 2018; Chicken fillets subjected to UV-C and pulsed UV light: Reduction of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria, and changes in sensory quality. J Food Saf. 38e12421

76.

Meza-Bone GA, Meza Bone JS, Cedeño Á, Martín I, Martín A, Maddela NR, Córdoba JJ. 2023; Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in RTE meat products of Quevedo (Ecuador). Foods. 12:2956

77.

Mitelut A, Popa M, Geicu M, Niculita P, Vatuiu D, Vatuiu I, Gilea B, Balint R, Cramariuc R. 2011; Ohmic treatment for microbial inhibition in meat and meat products. Rom Biotechnol Lett. 16:149-152.

78.

Mohammadi TN, Shen C, Li Y, Zayda MG, Sato J, Masuda Y, Honjoh K, Miyamoto T. 2022; Characterization of Clostridium perfringens bacteriophages and their application in chicken meat and milk. Int J Food Microbiol. 361:109446

79.

Momtaz H, Rahimian MD, Dehkordi FS. 2013; Identification and characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from raw chicken meat based on molecular and biological techniques. J Appl Poult Res. 22:137-145

80.

Montanari R. 2008; Cold chain tracking: A managerial perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol. 19:425-431

81.

Monteiro MLG, Mársico ET, Mutz YS, Castro VS, de Barros Pinto Moreira RV, Álvares TS, Conte-Junior CA. 2020; Combined effect of oxygen-scavenger packaging and UV-C radiation on shelf life of refrigerated tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets. Sci Rep. 10:4243

82.

Moye ZD, Woolston J, Sulakvelidze A. 2018; Bacteriophage applications for food production and processing. Viruses. 10:205

83.

Moyer CL, Eric Collins R, Morita RY. 2017 Psychrophiles and psychrotrophs. Reference module in life sciences. Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands:

84.

Munsch-Alatossava P, Gursoy O, Alatossava T. 2010; Potential of nitrogen gas (N2) to control psychrotrophs and mesophiles in raw milk. Microbiol Res. 165:122-132

85.

Myers K, Montoya D, Cannon J, Dickson J, Sebranek J. 2013; The effect of high hydrostatic pressure, sodium nitrite and salt concentration on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes on RTE ham and turkey. Meat Sci. 93:263-268

86.

Najjar MB, Chikindas M, Montville TJ. 2007; Changes in Listeria monocytogenes membrane fluidity in response to temperature stress. Appl Environ Microbiol. 73:6429-6435

87.

Ndraha N, Hsiao HI, Vlajic J, Yang MF, Lin HTV. 2018; Time-temperature abuse in the food cold chain: Review of issues, challenges, and recommendations. Food Control. 89:12-21

88.

Odeyemi OA, Alegbeleye OO, Strateva M, Stratev D. 2020; Understanding spoilage microbial community and spoilage mechanisms in foods of animal origin. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 19:311-331

89.

Oswaldi V, Dzierzon J, Thieme S, Merle R, Meemken D. 2021; Slaughter pigs as carrier of Listeria monocytogenes in Germany. J Consum Prot Food Saf. 16:109-115

90.

Palau R, Bloomfield SJ, Jenkins C, Greig DR, Jorgensen F, Mather AE. 2024; Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1A: An underappreciated potential pathogen in the food chain. Int J Food Microbiol. 412:110554

91.

Park S, Park E, Yoon Y. 2022; Comparison of nonthermal decontamination methods to improve the safety for raw beef consumption. J Food Prot. 85:664-670

92.

Pires RPS, Guimarães JT, Barros CP, Balthazar CF, Chincha AIA, Freitas MQ, Duarte MCKH, Silva PHF, Pimentel TC, Abud YKD, Sant’Anna C, Sant’Ana AS, Silva MC, Nascimento JS, Cruz AG. 2021; Ohmic heating increases inactivation and morphological changes of Salmonella sp. and the formation of bioactive compounds in infant formula. Food Microbiol. 97:103737

93.

Rahimi E, Ameri M, Momtaz H. 2010; Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Listeria species isolated from milk and dairy products in Iran. Food Control. 21:1448-1452

94.

Reichel J, Kehrenberg C, Krischek C. 2020; UV-C irradiation of rolled fillets of ham inoculated with Yersinia enterocolitica and Brochothrix thermosphacta. Foods. 9:552

95.

Rezaloo M, Motalebi A, Mashak Z, Anvar A. 2022; Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular description of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from meat and meat products. J Food Qual. 2022:9899338

96.

Richa R, Shahi NC, Singh A, Lohani UC, Omre PK, Kumar A, Bhattacharya TK. 2017; Ohmic heating technology and its application in meaty food: A review. Adv Res. 10:1-10

97.

Rossi LPR, Almeida RCC, Lopes LS, Figueiredo ACL, Ramos MPP, Almeida PF. 2011; Occurrence of Listeria spp. in Brazilian fresh sausage and control of Listeria monocytogenes using bacteriophage P100. Food Control. 22:954-958

98.

Rouger A, Moriceau N, Prévost H, Remenant B, Zagorec M. 2018; Diversity of bacterial communities in French chicken cuts stored under modified atmosphere packaging. Food Microbiol. 70:7-16

99.

Ruiz-Roldán L, Rojo-Bezares B, de Toro M, López M, Toledano P, Lozano C, Chichón G, Alvarez-Erviti L, Torres C, Sáenz Y. 2020; Antimicrobial resistance and virulence of Pseudomonas spp. among healthy animals: Concern about exolysin ExlA detection. Sci Rep. 10:11667

100.

Saha S, Majumder R, Rout P, Hossain S. 2024; Unveiling the significance of psychrotrophic bacteria in milk and milk product spoilage: A review. Microbe. 2:100034

101.

Samaržija D, Zamberlin Š, Pogačić T. 2012; Psychrotrophic bacteria and their negative effects on milk and dairy products quality. Mljekarstvo. 62:77-95.

102.

Saxena J, Makroo HA, Srivastava B. 2016; Optimization of time-electric field combination for PPO inactivation in sugarcane juice by ohmic heating and its shelf life assessment. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 71:329-338

103.

Shaltout FA, Osman IM, Kamel EA, Abd-Alla AK. 2017; Isolation of Clostridium perfringens from meat samples obtained from the University Students’ Hostel. EC Nutr. 9:142-150.

104.

Sheir SH, Ibrahim HM, Hassan MA, Shawky NA. 2020; Incidence of psychotropic bacteria in frozen chicken meat products with special reference to Pseudomonas species. Benha Vet Med J. 39:165-168

105.

Sillankorva SM, Oliveira H, Azeredo J. 2012; Bacteriophages and their role in food safety. Int J Microbiol. 2012:863945

106.

Silva FVM, Evelyn . 2023; Pasteurization of food and beverages by high pressure processing (HPP) at room temperature: Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella, and other microbial pathogens. Appl Sci. 13:1193

107.

Sofy AR, Sharaf AEMA, Al Karim AG, Hmed AA, Moharam KM. 2017; Prevalence of the harmful gram-negative bacteria in ready-to-eat foods in Egypt. Food Public Health. 7:59-68.

108.

Soltan Dallal MM, Doyle MP, Rezadehbashi M, Dabiri H, Sanaei M, Modarresi S, Bakhtiari R, Sharifiy K, Taremi M, Zali MR, Sharifi-Yazdi MK. 2010; Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella serotypes, Campylobacter and Yersinia spp. isolated from retail chicken and beef, Tehran, Iran. Food Control. 21:388-392

109.

Stratakos AC, Inguglia ES, Linton M, Tollerton J, Murphy L, Corcionivoschi N, Koidis A, Tiwari BK. 2019; Effect of high pressure processing on the safety, shelf life and quality of raw milk. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 52:325-333

110.

Sun H, Kawamura S, Himoto J, Itoh K, Wada T, Kimura T. 2008; Effects of ohmic heating on microbial counts and denaturation of proteins in milk. Food Sci Technol Res. 14:117-123

111.

Tapia MS, Alzamora SM, Chirife J. 2020; Effects of water activity (aw) on microbial stability as a hurdle in food preservation. In: Water activity in foods: Fundamentals and applications. 2nd ed In: Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Fontana AJ, Schmidt SJ, Labuza TP, editors.(ed)Wiley. Hoboken, NJ, USA: pp p. 323-355

112.

Tatini SR, Kauppi KL. 2002; ANALYSIS | Microbiological analyses. In Encyclopedia of dairy sciences. In: Roginski H, editor.(ed)Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: pp p. 74-79

113.

Tomat D, Casabonne C, Aquili V, Balagué C, Quiberoni A. 2018; Evaluation of a novel cocktail of six lytic bacteriophages against Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in broth, milk and meat. Food Microbiol. 76:434-442

114.

Torres-Vitela MR, Mendoza-Bernardo M, Castro-Rosas J, Gomez-Aldapa CA, Garay-Martinez LE, Navarro-Hidalgo V, Villarruel-López A. 2012; Incidence of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Staphylococcal Enterotoxin in two types of Mexican fresh cheeses. J Food Prot. 75:79-84

115.

Turchi B, Pero S, Torracca B, Fratini F, Mancini S, Galiero A, Pedonese F, Nuvoloni R, Cerri D. 2016; Occurrence of Clostridium spp. in ewe’s milk: Enumeration and identification of isolates. Dairy Sci Technol. 96:693-701

116.

Ulbin-Figlewicz N, Jarmoluk A. 2014; Antimicrobial activity of low-pressure plasma treatment against selected foodborne bacteria and meat microbiota. Ann Microbiol. 65:1537-1546

117.

Vianna PCB, Walter EHM, Dias MEF, Faria JAF, Netto FM, Gigante ML. 2012; Effect of addition of CO2 to raw milk on quality of UHT-treated milk. J Dairy Sci. 95:4256-4262

118.

Visuthiwan S, Assatarakul K. 2021; Kinetic modeling of microbial degradation and antioxidant reduction in lychee juice subjected to UV radiation and shelf life during cold storage. Food Control. 123:107770

119.

Vitas AI, Garcia-Jalon VAI. 2004; Occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh and processed foods in Navarra (Spain). Int J Food Micobiol. 90:349-356

120.

Wang GY, Li M, Ma F, Wang H, Xu X, Zhou G. 2017; Physicochemical properties of Pseudomonas fragi isolates response to modified atmosphere packaging. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 364:fnx106

121.

Wang LH, Wang MS, Zeng XA, Liu ZW. 2016; Temperature-mediated variations in cellular membrane fatty acid composition of Staphylococcus aureus in resistance to pulsed electric fields. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 1858:1791-1800

122.

Wei CI, Balaban MO, Fernando SY, Peplow AJ. 1991; Bacterial effect of high pressure CO2 treatment on foods spiked with Listeria or Salmonella. J Food Prot. 54:189-193

123.

Wei Q, Wang X, Sun DW, Pu H. 2019; Rapid detection and control of psychrotrophic microorganisms in cold storage foods: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 86:453-464

124.

Wickramasinghe NN, Ravensdale J, Coorey R, Chandry SP, Dykes GA. 2019; The predominance of psychrotrophic pseudomonads on aerobically stored chilled red meat. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 18:1622-1635

125.

Wiśniewski P, Chajęcka-Wierzchowska W, Zadernowska A. 2024; Impact of high-pressure processing (HPP) on Listeria monocytogenes: An overview of challenges and responses. Foods. 13:14

126.

Wu X, Yang L, Wu Y, Li H, Shao B. 2023; Spread of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in animal-derived foods in Beijing, China. Int J Food Microbiol. 403:110296

127.

Yoon Y, Lee H, Lee S, Kim S, Choi KH. 2015; Membrane fluidity-related adaptive response mechanisms of foodborne bacterial pathogens under environmental stresses. Food Res Int. 72:25-36

128.

Yuan L, Sadiq FA, Burmølle M, Wang N, He G. 2019; Insights into psychrotrophic bacteria in raw milk: A review. J Food Prot. 82:1148-1159

129.

Yuan L, Sadiq FA, Liu T, Flint S, Chen J, Yang H, Gu J, Zhang G, He G. 2017; Psychrotrophic bacterial populations in Chinese raw dairy milk. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 84:409-418

130.

Zeisel SH, Mar MH, Howe JC, Holden JM. 2003; Concentrations of choline-containing compounds and betaine in common foods. J Nutr. 133:1302-1307

131.

Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Hu H, Luo S, Zhang L, Zhou H, Li P. 2021; Effects of in-package atmospheric cold plasma treatment on the qualitative, metabolic and microbial stability of fresh-cut pears. J Sci Food Agric. 101:4473-4480