ARTICLE

Immunostimulatory Effect of Ovomucin Hydrolysates by Pancreatin in RAW 264.7 Macrophages via Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Signaling Pathway

Jin-Hong Jang1https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5234-4233, Ji-Eun Lee1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-0573, Kee-Tae Kim2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-7408, Dong Uk Ahn3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9523-7630, Hyun-Dong Paik1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-7703
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
2Research Institute, WithBio Inc, Seoul 05029, Korea
3Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
*Corresponding author : Hyun-Dong Paik, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea, Tel: +82-2-2049-6011, Fax: +82-2-455-3082, E-mail: hdpaik@konkuk.ac.kr

© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jan 24, 2024 ; Revised: Feb 26, 2024 ; Accepted: Mar 17, 2024

Published Online: Jul 01, 2024

Abstract

Ovomucin (OM), which has insoluble fractions is a viscous glycoprotein, found in egg albumin. Enzymatic hydrolysates of OM have water solubility and bioactive properties. This study investigated that the immunostimulatory effects of OM hydrolysates (OMHs) obtained by using various proteolytic enzymes (Alcalase®, bromelain, α-chymotrypsin, Neutrase®, pancreatin, papain, Protamax®, and trypsin) in RAW 264.7 cells. The results showed that OMH prepared with pancreatin (OMPA) produced the highest levels of nitrite oxide in RAW 264.7 cells, through upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression. The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 were increased with the cytokines mRNA expression. The effect of OMPA on mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway was increased the phosphorylation of p38, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in a concentration-dependent manner. Therefore, OMPA could be used as a potential immune-stimulating agent in the functional food industry.

Keywords: ovomucin; pancreatin; enzymatic hydrolysis; immunostimulating; mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway

Introduction

Protecting the body against bacteria, viruses, and other harmful substances in the immune system is a vital in maintaining physiological homeostasis (Lee et al., 2022a; Peters et al., 2019). Immune system disorders can cause autoimmunity, inflammation, and cancer. Thus, it is important for immunodeficiency patients to maintain their system (Lee et al., 2021). Innate immunity is a non-specific immune response that involves immune cells such as dendritic cells, macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and natural killer cells (Andrés et al., 2022; Baek et al., 2023). Immune cells associated with innate immunity can identify foreign invaders like bacteria and control the activation of other cells through various receptors and signaling pathways (Vijay, 2018). The macrophages stimulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway secrete pro-inflammatory factors such as nitrite oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and interleukin (IL)-6 (Cho et al., 2023a; Gautier and Yvan-Charvet, 2014; Sun et al., 2020). These pro-inflammatory factors regulate the immune system to protect the body from external infection (Abdulkhaleq et al., 2018). Several immunostimulants, which stimulate the immune system non-specifically, are highly toxic, side-effective, and expensive (Gasmi et al., 2023). Therefore, it is important to develop immune stimulants from natural materials with high stability (Gasmi et al., 2023; Nooraei et al., 2023).

Ovomucin (OM), a glycoprotein found in egg whites, has gelling property and contributes to foam stability (Sun et al., 2018; Tu et al., 2020). OM comprises two subunits, α-OM and β-OM, of which β-OM is more heavily glycosylated (Hiidenhovi, 2015). The insoluble OM contains approximately 2.5 times more β-OM than the soluble OM (Hiidenhovi, 2015), and is difficult to dissolve OM in water without sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and beta-mercaptoethanol (Abeyrathne et al., 2016). However, the process of chemically transforming proteins is complicated, and the reactions during the process leave toxic substances behind that lead to potential safety issues (Wang and Arntfield, 2016).

Enzymatic hydrolysis releases the encoded peptide by cleaving the peptide bond established in the protein (Cruz-Casas et al., 2021), and can enhance the functional properties of OM due to small peptide molocules (Moreau et al., 1997). Peptides hydrolyzed using various enzymes have different structural characteristics, such as amino acid lengths and sequences, and exhibit various functional activities (Cho et al., 2022). Previous studies reported that hydrolysates of ovalbumin, ovotransferrin, and ovomucoid have various functional properties (Abeyrathne et al., 2013; Abeyrathne et al., 2015; Rathnapala et al., 2021).

The functional properties of OM and OM hydrolysates (OMHs) have also been investigated; however, their specific immunomodulatory activities are not well understood. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the immunostimulatory properties of enzymatically hydrolyzed OM by quantifying the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) in RAW 264.7 macrophages. In addition, we determined the activation of the immunostimulatory mechanism via the MAPK signaling pathway and investigated the immune-stimulating activity of OMHs.

Materials and Methods

Materials and reagents

Alcalase, Neutrase, and Protamax were sourced from Novozymes (Basvaerd, Denmark), whereas bromelain and papain were purchased from Daejong (Seoul, Korea). α-Chymotrypsin (from bovine pancreas), pancreatin (from porcine pancreas), trypsin (from porcine pancreas), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), penicillin-streptomycin, fetal bovine serum (FBS), and phosphate-buffered saline were provided by HyClone (Logan, UT, USA). Thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and Griess reagent were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Ethyl alcohol and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Samchun (Seoul, Korea). Mouse TNF-α and IL-6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were obtained from AbFrontier (Seoul, Korea).

Preparation of ovomucin hydrolysates

OM was isolated from chicken egg whites, as described method (Abeyrathne et al., 2013). To produce the OMHs, various proteolytic enzymes, including Alcalase, bromelain, α-chymotrypsin, Neutrase, pancreatin, papain, Protamax, and trypsin were utilized as per the procedure outlined the method (Cho et al., 2022). Freeze-dried OM was solubilized in distilled water (20 mg/mL) and adjusted to pH 7.0. Prior to use, the enzymes were diluted in distilled water (20 mg/mL), with the exception of Alcalase in aqueous form. Each enzyme was added to the OM mixture at an enzyme to substrate ratio of 1:100 (w/w) and incubated at 37°C for 3 h. After the incubation period, the enzymes were deactivated by heating at 100°C for 15 min. The resulting hydrolysates were centrifuged at 10,000×g for 15 min, and the supernatant was lyophilized.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Peptides derived from OM were analyzed to assess their molecular weight using 20% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gels and a Mini-Protein II cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to stain the gels and visualize the protein bands.

Solubility

The protein solubility of the OM and OMHs were determined using the Lowry assay, as the described previously (Lowry et al., 1951). The sample concentrations were maintained at low levels to ensure complete dissolution of all proteins in DC protein assay reagents A and B (Bio-Rad Laboratories). OM and OMHs were centrifuged at 5,000×g for 10 min at 4°C. Then, 25 μL of DC protein assay reagent A and 200 μL of DC protein assay reagent B were loaded to a 96-well plate. Each well was seeded with 5 μL of sample supernatant. The 96 well-plate was incubated at 37°C for 15 min in the dark, and absorbance was measured at 750 nm using a microplate reader (Emax, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Bovine serum albumin was used to construct a standard curve for protein solubility. The solubility (%) of proteins was calculated using the following Eq. (1):

Solubility  ( % ) = ( OD treatment / OD control ) × 100
(1)
Cell culture

The RAW 264.7 cell line (Korean Cell Line Bank, Seoul, Korea) was cultured DMEM with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. The RAW 264.7 cell line was incubated in an MCO-18AIC incubator (Sanyo, Osaka, Japan) at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Cell viability

The viability of OMH treated RAW 264.7 cells in response to OMH was evaluated using the MTT assay as the described method (Lee et al., 2021). RAW 264.7 cells (2×105 cells/100μL) were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated for 4 h. Subsequently, OMH was added to the wells at concentrations of 125, 250, and 500 μg/mL. After incubation for 24 h, MTT solution (2 mg/mL) was added to each well. The cells were cultured for an additional 2 h. The supernatant was discarded, and formazan crystals were solubilized in DMSO. DMEM was used as a control. Absorbance at 570 nm was measured by using a microplate reader. Cell viability was calculated as a percentage using the following Eq. (2):

Cell viability  ( % ) = ( OD treatment / OD control ) × 100
(2)
Measurement of nitrite oxide production and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression

NO production was assessed using the Griess assay (Lee et al., 2022b). RAW 264.7 cells were loaded into a 96-well plate at a concentration of 2×105 cells/well and precultured for 2 h. Different concentrations of OMHs (62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL) were added to each well and incubated for 24 h. Cells treated with LPS (10 ng/mL) was used as positive controls. The amount of NO generated was quantified by adding the Griess reagent, a 1:1 mixture of 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in distilled water, and 1% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric acid. The absorbance of the plates was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (Emax, Molecular Devices). A standard curve for NO production was constructed using sodium nitrate. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to measure the impact of OMHs prepared with pancreatin (OMPA) on the mRNA expression of iNOS. RAW 264.7 cells were added to a 6-well plate (1×106 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h. Following treatment with various concentrations of OMPA (62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL), the cells were incubated for an additional 24 h. RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract the total RNA from RAW 264.7 cells. Total RNA was transformed into cDNA using a Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). iNOS mRNA expression levels were quantified using SYBR green reagent (PhileKorea, Daejeon, Korea) and a PikoReal Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The delta-delta Ct method was used to analyze the amplified mRNA levels, with β-actin serving as a reference gene. The primer sequences used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Primer sequences used in quantitative real-time PCR
Gene Sequence (5’–3’)
iNOS
 (Sense) CCCTTCCGAAGTTTCTGGCAGC
 (Antisense) GGCTGTCAGAGCCTCGTGGCTTTGG
IL-6
 (Sense) GTACTCCAGAAGACCAGAGG
 (Antisense) TGCTGGTGACAACCACGGCC
TNF-α
 (Sense) TTGACCTCAGCGCTGAGTTG
 (Antisense) CCTGTAGCCCACGTCGTAGC
β-actin
 (Sense) GTGGGCCGCCCTAGGCACCAG
 (Antisense) GGAGGAAGAGGATGCGGCAGT

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Download Excel Table
Cell morphology observation

In the presence of LPS (10 ng/mL) or OMPA (62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL), RAW 264.7 cells (4×105 cells/mL) were cultured for 24 h in 6-well plate. Morphological differences between RAW 264.7 cells were examined by capturing images using a light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The cell number of RAW 264.7 treated with OMPA was confirmed using the trypan blue assay (Felice et al., 2009).

Measurement of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 production

The impact of OMPA on the expression and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) was evaluated using qRT-PCR and ELISA. qRT-PCR analysis was conducted to assess the mRNA expression of TNF-α and IL-6 using a previously described method. ELISA was performed to measure TNF-α and IL-6 protein levels. RAW 264.7 cells (4×105 cells/well) were plated in a 12-well plate and incubated for 24 h. Following treatment with various concentrations of OMH (62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL), the cells were incubated for an additional 24 h. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the cell culture supernatant were analyzed using an ELISA kit (AbFrontier, Seoul, Korea) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Detection of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation using western blot

To detect MAPK phosphorylation, RAW 264.7 cells (3×106 cells/well) were cultured in a 6-well plate for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells were incubated for 30 min with LPS (10 ng/mL) and OMPA (62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL). Total protein was isolated from the cells using radioimmunoprecipitation buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. Protein from each sample (25 μg) was separated using 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. After blocking with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 1% Tween 20 (TBST), the membranes were incubated with specific primary antibodies against the total or phosphorylated forms of p38, JNK, and ERK. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h. After washing, the protein bands were identified using a reagent designed for enhanced chemiluminescence and visualized by exposing the PVDF membrane to an X-ray film. GAPDH was used as a loading control. The protein bands were quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical data are presented as the average value±SD. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s multiple range test was performed to evaluate the comparison of means, and a p-value less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Statistical evaluation was conducted using the SPSS software version 18 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results and Discussion

Hydrolysis and solubility of ovomucin hydrolysates

The SDS-PAGE patterns of the OMHs are shown in Fig. 1. Because OM is insoluble, it was not included in this experiment. Despite loading the same concentration (10 mg/mL) of OMHs into lanes 1 to 8, each OMH sample exhibited diverse band profiles and varying band thicknesses. These distinct band profiles suggest that the eight enzymes generated various peptides from OM. Additionally, the OMHs showed many low-molecular weight peptides, 10 kDa or less. Biologically functional peptides are generally short, consisted of 2 to 9 amino acids, with a low-molecular weight (Khiari et al., 2014). Consequently, these hydrolysates are likely to exhibit various functional activities.

kosfa-44-4-885-g1
Fig. 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of ovomucin hydrolysates (OMH). M, marker; lane 1, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Alcalase (OMAC); lane 2, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with bromelain (OMBM); lane 3, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with α-chymotrypsin (OMCT); lane 4, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Neutrase (OMNT); lane 5, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with pancreatin (OMPA); lane 6, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Papain (OMPP); lane 7, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Protamax (OMPT); lane 8, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with trypsin (OMTP). SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Download Original Figure

The effects of enzymatic hydrolysis on protein solubility are summarized in Table 2. The protein solubility of the OM was 3.68%, which was barely soluble. In contrast, the solubility of all OMHs was over 90%. Protein solubility can be enhanced through hydrolysis by reducing the size of protein molecules and increasing the repulsive forces between them (Gravel and Doyen, 2020; Sathe et al., 2018). Low-solubility proteins can accumulate intra- and intermolecularly to form large insoluble aggregates (Vihinen, 2020). Therefore, only OMHs were used in the subsequent studies.

Table 2. Solubility profiles of the ovomucin and ovomucin hydrolysates
Sample Solubility (%)
OM 3.68±1.14c
OMAC 91.92±3.27b
OMBM 95.32±2.12ab
OMCT 97.56±1.60a
OMNT 98.56±0.94a
OMPA 91.56±2.88b
OMPP 90.64±3.91b
OMPT 94.37±1.36ab
OMTP 97.93±1.19a

All values are presented as mean±SD.

a–c Different letters among samples indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

OM, ovomucin; OMAC, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Alcalase; OMBM, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with bromelanin; OMCT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with α-chymotrypsin; OMNT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Neutrase; OMPA, ovomucin hydrolysates prepared with pancreatin; OMPP, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with papain; OMPT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Protamax; OMTP, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with trypsin.

Download Excel Table
Effects of ovomucin hydrolysates on the cell viability

The effects of the hydrolysates on the viability of RAW 264.7 macrophages were evaluated using the MTT assay after treating the cells with OMHs for 24 h. For the concentrations of OMHs (62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL), excluding OMPP, the cell viability was over 85% (Fig. 2). Subsequent experiments were conducted at concentrations that did not induce cytotoxicity, because it was determined that cell growth affected at concentrations below 85%.

kosfa-44-4-885-g2
Fig. 2. Effects of ovomucin hydrolysates (OMHs) on RAW 264.7 cell viability. All values are mean±SD. a–m Different letters among samples indicate significant differences (p<0.05). OMAC, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Alcalase; OMBM, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with bromelanin; OMCT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with α-chymotrypsin; OMNT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Neutrase; OMPA, ovomucin hydrolysates prepared with pancreatin; OMPP, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with papain; OMPT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Protamax; OMTP, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with trypsin.
Download Original Figure
Effects of ovomucin hydrolysates on the nitrite oxide production and inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression in RAW 264.7 cells

As shown in Fig. 3A, NO production after treatment with LPS (10 ng/mL) was 18.86 μM, and all OMHs-treated samples increased NO production in a concentration-dependent manner (p<0.05). Among the OMHs, OMPA produced the highest amount of NO by 7.89 μM, 17.13 μM, and 21.47 μM at 62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL, respectively. At a concentration of 250 μg/mL, OMPA produced the highest NO production of 21.47 μM compared to the NO amount induced by LPS treatment (10 ng/mL). Therefore, OMPA was selected for further study.

kosfa-44-4-885-g3
Fig. 3. Effects of ovomucin hydrolysates (OMH) on the production of (A) nitric oxide and effects of OMPA on the expression of (B) iNOS mRNA in RAW 264.7 cells. Control: non-treated group. a–m Different letters among samples indicate significant differences (p<0.05). NO, nitrite oxide; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; OMAC, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Alcalase; OMBM, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with bromelanin; OMCT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with α-chymotrypsin; OMNT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Neutrase; OMPA, ovomucin hydrolysates prepared with pancreatin; OMPP, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with papain; OMPT, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with Protamax; OMTP, ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with trypsin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase.
Download Original Figure

iNOS catalyzes the conversion of L-arginine to NO and L-citulline via an oxidative deamination. NO is synthesized by iNOS, which is involved in the immune response to external stimuli such as bacterial LPS and cytokines (Jang et al., 2020). NO is a critical mediator of the inflammatory response and, plays a vital role in maintaining health by combating pathogenic microorganisms, eliminating tumor cells, and performing various essential biological functions (Cho et al., 2023b). Therefore, the effect of OMPA treatment on iNOS of that expression in macrophages was verified.

The effects of OMPA on iNOS expression are shown in Fig. 3B. LPS treatment significantly upregulated iNOS expression by 39.2-fold compared to the control group (p<0.05). Treatment with OMPA at concentrations of 62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL also led to a significant increase in iNOS mRNA expression by 19.2-, 38.3-, and 52.2-folds, respectively, compared to the control (p<0.05). The results of our study determined that OMPA induced iNOS expression and NO production (Figs. 3A and B).

Effects of ovomucin hydrolysates prepared with pancreatin on the morphological change of RAW 264.7 cells

The cells were treated with OMPA concentrations of 62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL to investigate the morphology and number of the RAW 264.7 cells under OMPA or LPS (10 ng/mL) treatment. As shown in Fig. 4A, it showed that the normal morphology of RAW 264.7 cells in the control group was round. After treatment with 250 μg/mL OMPA, the cells increased in size and showed a dendritic-like morphology, similar to the morphological changes observed in the LPS-treated group. As shown in Fig. 4B, the number of RAW cells was deceased by OMPA to 3.8×105 cells/mL, 3.6×105 cells/mL, and 3.4×105 cells/mL at 62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL, respectively. These results from the trypan blue assay showed a similar tendency to the effect of OMPA on the cell viability of Fig. 2.

kosfa-44-4-885-g4
Fig. 4. Effects of ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with pancreatin (OMPA) on the (A) morphological change and (B) cell number of RAW 264.7 cells. The group without OMPA was used as the control group, and LPS (10 ng/mL) was used as the positive control. LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
Download Original Figure
Effects of ovomucin hydrolysates prepared with pancreatin on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and mRNA expression in RAW 264.7 cells

Cytokines are humoral factors responsible for transducing signals between cells to maintain homeostasis and play a central role in the pathophysiology of various diseases (Narazaki and Kishimoto, 2022). Pro-inflammatory cytokines regulate host defense against pathogens by initiating inflammatory responses and mediating innate immune responses (Xiao et al., 2020).

TNF-α is a crucial component of the innate immune system, offering initial protection against foreign invaders prior to the activation of the adaptive immune response (Medzhitov and Janeway, 2000). It is primarily synthesized by macrophages upon the activation of membrane-bound pattern-recognition receptors, which recognize typical bacterial cell surface components, such as polysaccharides, carbohydrates, and LPSs (Berry et al., 2007).

IL-6 is an important signaling molecule in the transition from the innate immune response to the adaptive immune response (Wu et al., 2018). IL-6 stimulates the production of macrophages and neutrophils in innate immunity, and plays an important role in B cell maturation in adaptive immunity (Lee et al., 2022c). Therefore, the effects of OMPA treatment on the production and mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) were evaluated using ELISA and qRT-PCR.

As shown in Figs. 5A and B, OMPA treatment increased the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.05). Compared with LPS, which was used as a positive control, when the concentration of OMPA was 250 μg/mL, the production of TNF-α and IL-6 increased 2.3-fold and 15.4-fold, respectively.

kosfa-44-4-885-g5
Fig. 5. Effects of ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with pancreatin (OMPA) on the (A) TNF-α and (B) IL-6 production in RAW 264.7 cells. Effects of OMPA on the (C) TNF-α and (D) IL-6 mRNA expression in RAW 264.7 cells. The group without OMPA was used as the control group, and LPS (10 ng/mL) was used as the positive control. The results are expressed as the mean±SD of independent experiments. a–e Different letters on each bar indicate a statistically significant difference between values (p<0.05). TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; IL-6, interleukin-6.
Download Original Figure

Moreover, as presented in Figs. 5C and D, the mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) was dose-dependently enhanced in RAW 264.7 macrophages (p<0.05) by treatment with OMPA. After the treatment OMPA at a concentration of 250 μg/mL, the level of mRNA expression (TNF-α and IL-6) in RAW 264.7 macrophages increased to by 1.7 times and 12.3 times, respectively. These results show that immune-modulating effects can be exerted by upregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages at both mRNA and protein levels and that OMPA stimulates macrophages to upregulate pro-inflammatory cytokine and mRNA expression.

Effects of ovomucin hydrolysates prepared with pancreatin on the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway activation in RAW 264.7 cells

MAPK is a protein kinase capable of self-phosphorylation, specifically at its dual serine and threonine residues (Peti and Page, 2013). The MAPK signaling pathway is activated when ERK, JNK, and p38 are phosphorylated. Growth factors, hormones, and pro-inflammatory stimuli trigger ERK activation, whereas cellular and environmental stressors, along with pro-inflammatory stimuli, induce the activation of JNK and p38 (Kyriakis and Avruch, 2012; Mercedes et al., 2016). The MAPK signaling pathway contributes significantly to the regulation of various cellular physiological activities, including cell growth, maturation, proliferation, and apoptosis (Guo et al., 2020). Therefore, Western blotting was performed to determine whether OMPA treatment induces the phosphorylation of MAPKs (ERK, JNK, and p38) to activate RAW 264.7 cells.

As shown in Figs. 6A, B, C, and D, treatment with OMPA at 62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL induced the phosphorylation of p38, JNK and ERK, respectively, compared with the control. In contrast, no differences were observed in the total protein levels of p38, JNK, or ERK. LPS, a component of the cell wall in gram-negative bacteria, induces MAPK phosphorylation and contributes to macrophage activation. Treatment with OMPA (250 μg/mL) triggered the phosphorylation of ERK, JNK, and p38 to a level similar to that observed with LPS treatment.

kosfa-44-4-885-g6
Fig. 6. Effects of ovomucin hydrolysate prepared with pancreatin (OMPA) on the MAPK phosphorylation in RAW 264.7 cells. (A) Protein expression levels of MAPKs. Relative protein expression levels of (B) p-p38/p38, (C) p-JNK/JNK, (D) p-ERK/ERK. The group without OMPA was used as the control group, and LPS (10 ng/mL) was used as the positive control. GAPDH was used as the loading control. a–e Different letters indicate statistical differences in the group of samples (p<0.05). LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase.
Download Original Figure

These results indicate that OMPA triggers the activation of RAW 264.7 macrophages via the p38, JNK, and ERK signaling pathways.

Conclusion

In the present study, investigated the immunostimulatory effects of OMHs on RAW 264.7 cells. In conclusion, OMPA enhanced iNOS mRNA expression and NO production in RAW 264.7 cells. In addition, the treatment OMPA increased the production of TNF-α and IL-6 and gene expression mRNA expression by stimulating RAW 264.7 cells. OMPA triggered the phosphorylation of p38, JNK, and ERK, which are involved in the MAPK signaling pathway. Therefore, OMPA has been demonstrated to be a potential immune-stimulating agent in the pharmaceutical and or functional food industries. Furthermore, the poultry industry development can be improved by making high-valued functional poultry products, but further in vivo studies should be carried out to confirm the activity and safety of OMPA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, and Forestry (IPET) through the High Value–dded Food Technology Development Program, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (122031-3).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Paik HD. Data curation: Jang JH, Kim KT. Formal analysis: Jang JH, Lee JE. Methodology: Lee JE. Software: Jang JH. Validation: Jang JH, Lee JE. Investigation: Jang JH. Writing - original draft: Jang JH, Ahn DU, Paik HD. Writing - review & editing: Jang JH, Lee JE, Kim KT, Ahn DU, Paik HD.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Abdulkhaleq LA, Assi MA, Abdullah R, Zamri-Saad M, Taufiq-Yap YH, Hezmee MNM. 2018; The crucial roles of inflammatory mediators in inflammation: A review. Vet World. 11:627-635

2.

Abeyrathne EDNS, Lee HY, Ahn DU. 2013; Egg white proteins and their potential use in food processing or as nutraceutical and pharmaceutical agents: A review. Poult Sci. 92:3292-3299

3.

Abeyrathne EDNS, Lee HY, Jo C, Suh JW, Ahn DU. 2015; Enzymatic hydrolysis of ovomucoid and the functional properties of its hydrolysates. Poult Sci. 94:2280-2287

4.

Abeyrathne EDNS, Lee HY, Jo C, Suh JW, Ahn DU. 2016; Enzymatic hydrolysis of ovomucin and the functional and structural characteristics of peptides in the hydrolysates. Food Chem. 192:107-113

5.

Andrés CMC, Pérez de la Lastra JM, Juan CA, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E. 2022; The role of reactive species on innate immunity. Vaccines. 10:1735

6.

Baek S, Park CI, Hwang YG, Jeon H, Kim SE, Song A, Park HJ, Park I, Kang J, Cha JY. 2023; Enzyme-derived deer velvet extract activate the immune response in cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppressive mice. Food Sci Biotechnol. 32:1435-1444

7.

Berry M, Brightling C, Pavord I, Wardlaw AJ. 2007; TNF-α in asthma. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 7:279-282

8.

Cho HY, Lee JE, Lee JH, Ahn DU, Kim KT, Paik HD. 2022; Anti-biofilm effect of egg white ovotransferrin and its hydrolysates against Listeria monocytogenes. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 165:113759

9.

Cho HY, Lee JE, Lee JH, Ahn DU, Paik HD. 2023a; The immune-enhancing activity of egg white ovalbumin hydrolysate prepared with papain via MAPK signaling pathway in RAW 264.7 macrophages. J Funct Foods. 103:105487

10.

Cho Y, Han HT, Kim T, Sohn M, Park YS. 2023b; Immunostimulatory activity of Lactococcus lactis LM1185 isolated from Hydrangea macrophylla. Food Sci Biotechnol. 32:497-506

11.

Cruz-Casas DE, Aguilar CN, Ascacio-Valdés JA, Rodríguez-Herrera R, Chávez-González ML, Flores-Gallegos AC. 2021; Enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation: The most favorable biotechnological methods for the release of bioactive peptides. Food Chem Mol Sci. 3:100047

12.

Felice DL, Sun J, Liu RH. 2009; A modified methylene blue assay for accurate cell counting. J Funct Foods. 1:109-118

13.

Gasmi A, Shanaida M, Oleshchuk O, Semenova Y, Mujawdiya PK, Ivankiv Y, Pokryshko O, Noor S, Piscopo S, Adamiv S, Bjørklund G. 2023; Natural ingredients to improve immunity. Pharmaceuticals. 16:528

14.

Gautier EL, Yvan-Charvet L. 2014; Understanding macrophage diversity at the ontogenic and transcriptomic levels. Immunol Rev. 262:85-95

15.

Gravel A, Doyen A. 2020; The use of edible insect proteins in food: Challenges and issues related to their functional properties. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 59:102272

16.

Guo YJ, Pan WW, Liu SB, Shen ZF, Xu Y, Hu LL. 2020; ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis. Exp Ther Med. 19:1997-2007

17.

Hiidenhovi J. 2015 Isolation and characterization of ovomucin: A bioactive agent of egg white. Ph.D. dissertation. Turku Univ. Turku, Finland: .

18.

Jang M, Hwang I, Hwang B, Kim G. 2020; Anti-inflammatory effect of Antirrhinum majus extract in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Food Sci Nutr. 8:5063-5070

19.

Khiari Z, Ndagijimana M, Betti M. 2014; Low molecular weight bioactive peptides derived from the enzymatic hydrolysis of collagen after isoelectric solubilization/precipitation process of turkey by-products. Poult Sci. 93:2347-2362

20.

Kyriakis JM, Avruch J. 2012; Mammalian MAPK signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation: A 10-year update. Physiol Rev. 92:689-737

21.

Lee HN, Choi JH, Park JY, Ahn JH, Jang DE, Shim JG, Park JH, Kim YM. 2021; Combination of vegetable soup and glucan demonstrates synergistic effects on macrophage-mediated immune responses. Food Sci Biotechnol. 30:583-588

22.

Lee J, Kim S, Kang CH. 2022a; Immunostimulatory activity of lactic acid bacteria cell-free supernatants through the activation of NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways in RAW 264.7 cells. Microorganisms. 10:2247

23.

Lee JE, Lee JH, Min B, Kim KT, Ahn DU, Paik HD. 2022b; Immunostimulatory effect of egg yolk phosvitin phosphopeptides produced by high-temperature and mild-pressure pretreatment and enzyme combinations in RAW 264.7 cells via TLR2/MAPK signaling pathway. J Funct Foods. 98:105264

24.

Lee JH, Lee JE, Paik HD. 2022c; Immunomodulatory activity of egg yolk protein hydrolysates prepared by novel two-step hydrolysis: A study of mechanism and stability after in vitro digestion model. Poult Sci. 101:101802

25.

Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Lewis Farr A, Randall RJ. 1951; Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 193:265-275

26.

Medzhitov R, Janeway C. 2000; Innate immunity. N Engl J Med. 343:338-344

27.

Mercedes SS, Diniz FF, Gomes GN, Bahia D. 2016; The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway: Role in immune evasion by trypanosomatids. Front Microbiol. 7:183

28.

Moreau S, Nau F, Piot M, Guerin C, Brule G. 1997; Hydrolysis of hen egg white ovomucin. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A. 205:329-334

29.

Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. 2022; Current status and prospects of IL-6–targeting therapy. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 15:575-592

30.

Nooraei S, Sarkar Lotfabadi A, Akbarzadehmoallemkolaei M, Rezaei N. 2023; Immunogenicity of different types of adjuvants and nano-adjuvants in veterinary vaccines: A comprehensive review. Vaccines. 11:453

31.

Peters VBM, van de Steeg E, van Bilsen J, Meijerink M. 2019; Mechanisms and immunomodulatory properties of pre- and probiotics. Benef Microbes. 10:225-236

32.

Peti W, Page R. 2013; Molecular basis of MAP kinase regulation. Protein Sci. 22:1698-1710

33.

Rathnapala ECN, Ahn DU, Abeyrathne EDNS. 2021; Enzymatic hydrolysis of ovotransferrin and the functional properties of its hydrolysates. Food Sci Anim Resour. 41:608-622

34.

Sathe SK, Zaffran VD, Gupta S, Li T. 2018; Protein solubilization. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 95:883-901

35.

Sun F, Luo JH, Yue TT, Wang FX, Yang CL, Zhang S, Wang XQ, Wang CY. 2020; The role of hydrogen sulphide signalling in macrophage activation. Immunology. 162:3-10

36.

Sun X, Huang J, Zeng H, Wu J. 2018; Protein-resistant property of egg white ovomucin under different pHs and ionic strengths. J Agric Food Chem. 66:11034-11042

37.

Tu A, Zhao X, Shan Y, Lü X. 2020; Potential role of ovomucin and its peptides in modulation of intestinal health: A review. Int J Biol Macromol. 162:385-393

38.

Vihinen M. 2020; Solubility of proteins. ADMET DMPK. 8:391-399

39.

Vijay K. 2018; Toll-like receptors in immunity and inflammatory diseases: Past, present, and future. Int Immunopharmacol. 59:391-412

40.

Wang K, Arntfield SD. 2016; Modification of interactions between selected volatile flavour compounds and salt-extracted pea protein isolates using chemical and enzymatic approaches. Food Hydrocoll. 61:567-577

41.

Wu F, Zhou C, Zhou D, Ou S, Liu Z, Huang H. 2018; Immune-enhancing activities of chondroitin sulfate in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. Carbohydr Polym. 198:611-619

42.

Xiao N, Hao S, Zhang Y, Shao Z. 2020; Roles of immune responses in the pathogenesis of immunorelated pancytopenia. Scand J Immunol. 92e12911